Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-10-10
Type P 10 Property Partition
Docket 30 entries
Disposition withdrawal of action

Parties

Plaintiff Matthew Tepas
Defendant Katherine Tepas

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ITHDRAWAL OF ACTION
  2. OMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE
  4. PPEARANCE Appearance
  5. ETURN OF SERVICE
  6. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 11/12/2024 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  7. RDER RESULT: Granted 11/12/2024 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  8. BJECTION TO MOTION RESULT: Overruled 11/12/2024 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  9. RDER RESULT: Overruled 11/12/2024 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  10. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 1/3/2025 BY THE CLERK
  11. RDER RESULT: Denied 1/3/2025 BY THE CLERK
  12. NSWER
  13. ERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  14. CHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Accepted 2/4/2025 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  15. RDER Accepted with Changes RESULT: Accepted 2/4/2025 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL Last Updated: Additional Description - 02/04/2025
  16. OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  17. EMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
  18. OTION FOR JUDGMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION RESULT: Granted 3/19/2025 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  19. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/19/2025 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  20. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 3/19/2025 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  21. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/19/2025 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  22. UDGMENT BY STIPULATION BEFORE TRIAL COMMENCED RESULT: HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  23. OTION FOR CONTEMPT POST-JUDGMENT
  24. OTION FOR ORDER
  25. OTION TO OPEN JUDGMENT RESULT: Granted 9/26/2025 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  26. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/26/2025 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  27. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 9/26/2025 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  28. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/26/2025 HON MATTHEW WAX-KRELL
  29. EPLACE RECORD TO TRIAL LIST STATUS (KEYPOINT 3) AND ERASE ALL HIGHER KEYPOINT DATES
  30. ITHDRAWAL OF ACTION

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.