Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-11-21
Status Open
Type Auto Surcharge Appeal
Docket 15 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Salib, Nagy
Defendant Board Of Appeal On Motor Vehicle Liability Policies And Bonds Division Of Insurance|Safety Insurance Company

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. JUDGMENT of dismissal, Nagy Salib failed to comply with an ORDER of the Court dated 04/18/2025. It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: The complaint is dismissed for lack of prosecution as a Notification has not been filed by Plaintiff of service of their Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (cs)
  2. Auto surcharge appeal filed.
  3. Case assigned to: DCM Track X - Accelerated was added on 11/21/2023
  4. Original civil complaint filed.
  5. Civil action cover sheet filed.
  6. Service Returned for Defendant Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies and Bonds - Division of Insurance: Service via certified mail; dated: 12/13/2023
  7. Service Returned for Defendant Safety Insurance Company: Service via certified mail; dated 12/13/2023
  8. Attorney appearance On this date Alexandra M Dufresne, Esq. added for Defendant Safety Insurance Company
  9. Order for Filing of the Administrative Record in G.L c. 30A proceedings, the defendant Administrative Agency shall file the Administrative Record by 05/06/2024
  10. ORDER sent for Status Review, if notice is not received by 09/20/2024 the complaint will be dismissed.
  11. Status review notice returned I already have a full file of all needed since December 2023. I am waiting for the defendants to respond to the hearing I requested but no response from them since then, and I stopped by many times at the superior court and was directed to call the attorney general office and ask for the name of the attorney of my case. I called many times and left a voice mail but again no response I am asking to either get a hearing scheduled or be not guilty by default as no one is responding however the superior court too send an email back in April of 2024. I did pay all the scheduling fees and I sent certified letters by mail to the defendant and a copy of these letters is in my file at Dedham Superior Court, please let me know what the next step should be thanks (rec'd 9/18/24) Applies To: Salib, Nagy (Plaintiff)
  12. Attorney appearance On this date David R Marks, Esq. added as Attorney for the Commonwealth for Defendant Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies and Bonds - Division of Insurance (E-filed 10/7/24)
  13. Administrative record filed: Applies To: Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies and Bonds - Division of Insurance (Defendant)
  14. Waiver of Oral Argument filed by Board of Appeals on Motor Vehicle Liability Policiea ND Bonds Applies To: Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies and Bonds - Division of Insurance (Defendant)
  15. It is Ordered that judgment of dismissal shall enter for failure to prosecute, thirty days from the date of this order, unless prior to that date the plaintiff has served a motion for judgment on the pleadings, and has so notified the clerk of this Court. Judge: Doolin, Hon. Michael

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase