Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-06
Status Open
Type Proprietary Information Or Trade Secrets
Docket 34 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Nauset Disposal Holdings, Inc.
Defendant Bayuk, Jennifer|Barrows Waste Systems, Llc

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FILED by Christopher B. Kaczmarek, Esq.
  2. Civil action cover sheet filed. (Business Litigation Session)
  3. Nauset Disposal Holdings, Inc.'s MOTION for appointment of Special Process Server. Endorsed as ALLOWED.
  4. Plaintiff(s) Nauset Disposal Holdings, Inc. EMERGENCY motion filed for expedited discovery
  5. Endorsement on motion for (#4.0): expedited discovery Other action taken After review, I will not act on this motion without a hearing after notice to defendants and an opportunity to be heard, except that defendant Jennifer Bayuk shall preserve, as applicable, all data on her home, personal and business computers, mobile telephones, PDA's, smart phones, USB storage devices, separate hard drives and personal email and cloud storage accounts. The court will conduct a hearing on this motion on 03/28/2024 at 2 p.m. in person in courtroom 1309.
  6. NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE INTO BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION
  7. Service Returned for Defendant Bayuk, Jennifer: Service made at last and usual; 10 Atherton Road, Apt. 1, Hull, MA 02045 on 3/23/2024
  8. Service Returned for Defendant Barrows Waste Systems, LLC: Service through person in charge / agent; Bryan Barrows, at 243 Queen Anne Road, Harwich, MA 02645, on 03/25/2024
  9. APPEARANCE FILED BY Harrison T Barrow, III, Esq., for Jennifer Bayuk
  10. APPEARANCE FILED BY Jeremy M Carter, Esq., for Barrows Waste Systems, LLC
  11. Defendant Barrows Waste Systems, LLC's Motion to dismiss all counts
  12. Opposition to P#4, Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery filed by Jennifer Bayuk
  13. Affidavit of Jennifer Bayuk
  14. ORDER TRANSFERING CASE TO BARNSTABLE SUPERIOR COURT Pursuant to G.L. c. 223, sec 15, and Superior Court Administrative Directive No. 17.1, because the parties do not reside or have their principal place of business in Suffolk County as required for venue under G.L. c. 223, sec.1, and defendants do not acquiesce to venue in Suffolk County, see Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket #10), and with the parties' agreement after hearing, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: This case shall be dismissed without prejudice from Suffolk Superior Court and the Clerk shall transfer the papers to the Barnstable Superior Court for docketing and further proceedings in that venue.
  15. Defendant's Notice of intent to file motion to Dismiss Applies To: Carter, Esq., Jeremy M (Attorney) on behalf of Barrows Waste Systems, LLC (Defendant)
  16. Amended: FIRST amended complaint filed by Nauset Disposal Holdings, Inc.
  17. Summons, returned SERVED last and usual at 7 Manito Road, Apartment A, Orleans, MA on June 3, 2024. Applies To: Bayuk, Jennifer (Defendant)
  18. Event Result:: Rule 16 Conference scheduled on: 06/14/2024 10:30 AM : Held as Scheduled
  19. ORDER: Rule 16 Conference Existing tracking order dates remain
  20. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY CLAIM WITH COUNTERCLAIM; received from Defendant Bayuk, Jennifer.
  21. Defendant Barrows Waste Systems, LLC's Notice of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint pursuant to Superior Court Rule 9E
  22. Answer to the counterclaim P # 17 Applies To: Nauset Disposal Holdings, Inc. (Plaintiff)
  23. Pleading titled, Rule 12 Motion, filed with the court on 07/26/2024, returned to Jeremy M Carter, Esq. Motion did not contain a 9A Affidavit, Document Title Page or Notice of Filing. (Destroyed after t/c with Atty)
  24. Plaintiff Nauset Disposal Holdings, Inc.'s Joint Motion of Confidentiality Stipulation and Order for the Production and exchange of confidential Information
  25. Proposed Filings/Orders
  26. Endorsement on Motion for Entry of Confidentiality Stipulation and Order (#20.0): ALLOWED So ordered.
  27. ORDER: Confidentiality Stipulation and Order for the Production and Exchange of Confidential Information
  28. Rule 9A list of documents filed. RE: P#22.1, Defendant, Barrows Waste Systems, LLC's Motion to Dismiss
  29. Defendant Barrows Waste Systems, LLC's Motion to dismiss all counts
  30. Barrows Waste Systems, LLC's Memorandum in support of P#22.1, Defendant, Barrows Waste Systems, LLC's Motion to Dismiss
  31. Opposition to P#22.1, Defendant, Barrows Waste Systems, LLC's Motion to Dismiss filed by Nauset Disposal Holdings, Inc.
  32. Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A With Notice of Filing and Certificate of Service Applies To: Carter, Esq., Jeremy M (Attorney) on behalf of Barrows Waste Systems, LLC (Defendant)
  33. Defendant Barrows Waste Systems, LLC's Assented to Motion to Continue Rule 12 Hearing
  34. Endorsement on Motion to continue / reschedule an event Rule 12 Hearing (#23.0): ALLOWED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more