Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-03-06
Status Open
Type Tortious Action Involving An Incarcerated Party
Docket 36 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Payne, Howard
Defendant Metro Housing Boston|Payne, Iris

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Attorney appearance On this date Pro Se added for Plaintiff Howard Payne
  2. Case assigned to: DCM Track A - Average was added on 03/06/2024
  3. Original civil complaint filed.
  4. Civil action cover sheet filed.
  5. ORDER: After a review of your petition and correspondence, the Court has instructed the Clerk's Office to take the following action: Service is to be made upon defendant(s) by means of certified mail at the plaintiff's expense, and you must return to the court the original summons with the green return receipt card for each defendant. A copy of the complaint is to be sent to the Office of the Attorney General or the Department of Corrections by the plaintiff(s). Notice sent (3/7/24)
  6. Docket Note: 2 summonses mailed to plaintiff this day Order P#4 sent to Anita Cordy to fax to MCI Shirley requesting a canteen account for (6) months.
  7. Service Returned for Defendant Metro Housing Boston: Service via certified mail
  8. Service Returned for Defendant Payne, Iris: Service via certified mail (Green return receipt unsigned)
  9. Plaintiff Howard Payne's Motion to Order Stopping Payments to Iris Payne and Direct them to be sent to PHH Mortgage Services, P.O. Box 371458 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7458
  10. Endorsement on Motion to Order Stopping Payments to Iris Payne and Direct them to be sent to PHH Mortgage Services, P.O. Box 371458 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7458 (#6.0): Other action taken Defendants shall have until April 30, 2024 to file a response to this motion. (Dated 4/5/24) Notice Sent 4/8/24
  11. Opposition to Plaintiff, Howard Payne's Motion to Redirect Residential Lease Payments and/or Other Payments and Request for Additional Time (30 Days) to File a Responsive Pleading to the Underlying Complaint of the Plaintiff, Howard Payne filed by Iris Payne
  12. Defendant Iris Payne's Certificate of Service
  13. Attorney appearance On this date Laurence Michael Kelley, Esq. added for Defendant Iris Payne
  14. Endorsement on Motion of Order Stopping Payments to Iris Payne and Direct them to be sent to PHH Mortgage Services, P.O. Box 371458 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7458 (#6.0): DENIED Denied for the reasons set for in Defendant Payne's Opposition. (Dated: 5/3/24) Notice sent 5/07/2024.
  15. Endorsement on Submission of Opposition to Plaintiff, Howard Payne's Motion to Redirect Residential Lease Payments and/or Other Payments and Request for Additional Time (30 Days) to File a Responsive Pleading to the Underlying Complaint of the Plaintiff, Howard Payne (#7.0): ALLOWED The request for additional time is ALLOWED. Both Defendants have until 5/31/24 to file a response to the complaint. (Dated: 5/3/24) Notice sent 5/07/2024.
  16. Plaintiff Howard Payne's Motion for Default Judgment
  17. Plaintiff Howard Payne's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, and, Preliminary Injunction
  18. Endorsement on Motion for Default Judgment (#8.0): DENIED The Motion for default is DENIED; as the Defendant's have been given an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. The Clerk shall mail plaintiff a copy of the docket containing opposing counsel's name and address and plaintiff's shall serve all pleadings on counsel in the future. (Dated 5/13/2024) Notice sent 5/14/24
  19. Endorsement on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, and, Preliminary Injunction (#9.0): DENIED (Dated 5/13/2024) Notice sent 5/14/24
  20. Plaintiff Howard Payne's Response to Iris Payne's Response, and Specifically Limited to Paragraph 6
  21. Plaintiff Howard Payne's Motion for Default Judgment Endorsement: Denied. This is the second time plaintiff has moved for default in the span of a week, despite the defendants having been given an extension of time to respond. See Order dated 5/14/24. Plaintiff is warned not to engage in serial filing in the future. (dated 5/15/24) Notice Sent 5/17/24
  22. Defendant Iris Payne's Motion for A More Definite Statement Relative To The Complaint Of The Plaintiff, Howard Payne Pursuant to M.R.C.P. 12(e)
  23. Plaintiff Howard Payne's Motion for Court to Order Iris Payne to identify Court Clerk that advised her Certified Mail was insufficient to satisfy Service
  24. Endorsement on Motion for A More Definite Statement Relative To The Complaint Of The Plaintiff, Howard Payne Pursuant to M.R.C.P. 12(e) (#12.0): Other action taken Plaintiff shall have until July 8, 2024 to file a response to this motion. (dated 6/7/24) Notice Sent 6/11/24
  25. Endorsement on Motion for Court to Order Iris Payne to Identify Court Clerk that Advised her Certified Mail was Insufficient to Satisfy Service (#13.0): DENIED Denied. The extension that was granted to the defendant was not based on any allegation regarding information from the clerk's office. (Dated 6/7/24) Notice Sent 6/11/24
  26. Plaintiff Howard Payne's Submission of More Definite Statement relative to the Complaint of the Plaintiff
  27. Plaintiff Howard Payne's Motion for Reconsideration for Motion for Court to Order Iris Payne to Identify Court Clerk that advised her Certified Mail was Insufficient to Satisfy Service
  28. Endorsement on Motion for Reconsideration for Motion for Court to Order Iris Payne to Identify Court Clerk that advised her Certified Mail was Insufficient to Satisfy Service (#15.0): DENIED (Dated: 7/8/24) Notice Sent 7/8/24
  29. Opposition to the motion for reconsideration, docket entry no. 15, filed by the Plaintiff, Howard Payne, and motion to strike the motion and for other relief filed by Iris Payne
  30. Plaintiff Howard Payne's Reply to Opposition to the Motion for Reconsideration, Docket Entry No. 15, filed by the Plaintiff, Howard Payne, and Motion to Strike the Motion and for Other Relief
  31. Endorsement on Motion for a more definite statement relative to the complaint of the Plaintiff (#12.0): Other action taken See separate order for action taken. (Dated 7/30/24) Notice sent 7/31/24
  32. ORDER: Order on Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement/Motion to Dismiss (No. 12); and Order Staying Proceedings Pending Disposition of Divorce Action See paper #18 (Dated 7/30/24) Notice sent 7/31/24
  33. Received from Defendant Payne, Iris: Answer with claim for trial by jury;
  34. Plaintiff Howard Payne's Motion to be Supplied with Court Order of July 30, 2024, Docket Entry #18, and Defendant Iris Payne's Verified Answer Page 4, Dated August 20, 2024
  35. Affidavit of Plaintiff in support of Motion to be Supplied with Court Order of July 30, 2024, Docket Entry #18, and Defendant Iris Payne's Verified Answer Page 4, Dated August 20, 2024 Applies To: Payne, Howard (Plaintiff)
  36. Endorsement on Motion to be Supplied with Court Order of July 30, 2024, Docket Entry #18, and Defendant Iris Payne's Verified Answer Page 4, Dated August 20, 2024 (#20.0): Other action taken The Clerk shall mail copies of docket nos. 18 + 19 to the plaintiff. (dated 9/26/24) Notice sent 9/27/24

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase