Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Vermont Unified

Court

Vermont Unified

Vermont

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-27
Status Disposed
Type Probate Appeal
Docket 19 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - S. Scott Smith, Benjamin Chater
  2. Case Open
  3. Notice of Appeal Filed TC NOA Date: 06/20/2024
  4. Transmittal Form Entry fee has not been paid
  5. Appellant Self-Represented Litigant Party: Appellant Leonard, Brenda
  6. Case Number Assignment Notice
  7. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Chater, Benjamin; Appellate Attorney Smith, S. Scott
  8. Letter Sent Sent rules & pro se attestation Sent To: Appellant Leonard, Brenda Sent rules & pro se attestation
  9. Note Informed by Rutland Civil Division that the appeal entry fee was paid.
  10. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - S. Scott Smith, Benjamin Chater
  11. Final Decision Miscellaneous PLR/HEE/KRC/WDC/NJW Mandate: Dismissed
  12. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Chater, Benjamin; Appellate Attorney Smith, S. Scott
  13. Letter Sent Sent To: Appellant Leonard, Brenda; Interested Party Gawrys, James E.; Interested Party Gawrys, Elaine
  14. Appellant's Docketing Statement Filed by: Appellant Leonard, Brenda
  15. Case Closed
  16. Motion to Extend Time or Continue Filed by: Appellant Leonard, Brenda
  17. Sent to Case Parties Automated by RIS for SOP processing - S. Scott Smith, Benjamin Chater
  18. Entry Regarding Motion - Denied (Judicial Officer: Cohen, William D.) Moot.
  19. Notice to Parties Recipients: Appellate Attorney Chater, Benjamin; Appellate Attorney Smith, S. Scott

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more