Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-01-11
Status Case Closed
Type Civil Appeal Family Law Proper Person
Docket 9 entries
Disposition affirmance

Docket Entries

  1. Case Closed. (COA).
  2. Filed Appellant's Proper Person Motion for Request to Take Mandatory Judicial Notice of Recent Supreme Court Advanced Opinion Regarding Paternity. (COA)
  3. Filed Order of Affirmance. "We affirm the district court's order denying Hammer's motion." fn4 [We grant Hammer's July 21, 2022, motion requesting that we take judicial notice of additional legal authorities, which is essentially a notice of supplemental authorities under NRAP 31(e). However, although we have considered these authorities, they do not affect the outcome of our disposition. Additionally, we deny Rasmussen's request in her answering brief that we deem Hammer a vexatious litigant.] COA-MG/JT/BB. (COA)
  4. Transferred to Supreme Court. (COA)
  5. Case Closed
  6. Filed Order Recalling Remittitur and Granting Motion for Extension of Time. The clerk of this court filed appellant's untimely motion for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing. The clerk shall recall the remittitur issued on November 21, 2022. The motion for an extension of time is granted. The clerk shall file in the Court of Appeals the petition for rehearing received on November 21, 2022. The clerk shall file this order in both this court and the Court of Appeals. (COA)
  7. Filed Proper Person Petition for Rehearing. (COA)
  8. Filed Order Denying Rehearing. "Rehearing Denied." NRAP 40(c). Court of Appeals- MG/JT/BB. (COA)
  9. Transferred to Supreme Court. (COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.