Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Middlesex County

Court

Middlesex County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-24
Type T 02 Torts Defective Premises Private Snow Or Ice
Docket 40 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Tara Murafsky
Defendant Michael Lafleur|Brenda Lafleur

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ANSWER AND/OR OBJECTIONS TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS PB 13-23(a) Re Brenda LaFleur
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. RETURN OF SERVICE
  6. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  7. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON RUPAL SHAH
  8. NOTICE Of Service of Discovery to Plaintiff
  9. CLAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  10. NOTICE Notice of Standard 203/206: MICHAEL LAFLEUR
  11. NOTICE Notice of Standard 203/206: BRENDA LAFLEUR
  12. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  13. AMENDED COMPLAINT AMENDED COMPLAINT BY CONSENT
  14. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  15. REPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE
  16. CERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  17. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 1/21/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  18. ORDER RESULT: Granted 1/21/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  19. SCHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES RESULT: Order 1/14/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  20. ORDER RESULT: Order 1/14/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  21. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE Forms 202, 205, & 217
  22. MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE - PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD - 13-6/13-9) as to Michael LaFleur RESULT: Withdrawn 2/10/2025 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  23. MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE - PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD - 13-6/13-9) RESULT: Withdrawn 2/10/2025 BY THE PLAINTIFF
  24. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION 114.00 Motion for Order of Compliance
  25. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION 115.00 Motion for Order of Compliance
  26. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Short ED
  27. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS
  28. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS
  29. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Supplemental
  30. OFFER OF COMPROMISE As to Michael Lafleur
  31. OFFER OF COMPROMISE As to Brenda Lafleur
  32. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS John Bagioni
  33. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22 As to Brenda Lafleur
  34. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22 As to Michael Lafleur
  35. ELECTRONIC SERVICE NOTICE JD-ES-286 updating primary attorney email address
  36. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME To Respond to RFA RESULT: Granted 10/20/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  37. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/20/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  38. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  39. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Memo in Support of MSJ
  40. ANSWER AND/OR OBJECTIONS TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS PB 13-23(a) Re Michael LaFleur

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more