Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-06-21
Status Judgment
Type 16 Unlimited Fraud
Docket 41 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Valera, Fernando
Defendant Alvarez, Hector Mario, Jr|Alvarez, Raul
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer diaz, Maria G

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer diaz, Maria G

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case Management Conference Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G Hearing Time 3:00 PM Cancel Reason Judgment
  2. Civil case cover sheet View Document Civil Case Cover Sheet
  3. Summons issued and filed View Document Summons
  4. Notice of Hearing View Document CV-48 Notice of Case Management Conference and Assignment of Judge for All Purposes Comment Notice of CMC and Assignment of Judge for All Purposes
  5. Proof of Service View Document - Proof of Service of Summons
  6. Proof of Service View Document - Proof of Service of Summons
  7. Summons and Complaint Served
  8. Summons and Complaint Served
  9. Request to Enter Default
  10. Request to Enter Default
  11. Chambers Work- Pre Original Type Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Brickey, Daniel Hearing Time 5:30 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  12. Minute Order Attachment View Document Minute Order Attachment Comment From Chambers
  13. Request for Court Judgment View Document - Request for Court Judgment
  14. Judgment Received View Document - Proposed Court Judgment Comment [Proposed] Court Judgment
  15. Declaration Filed View Document - Declaration of J Panicker Comment of Jennifer Panicker ISO Request for Default Judgment
  16. Declaration Filed View Document - Declaration of N Estela Comment of Nancy Estela Cordova ISO Request for Default Judgment
  17. Declaration Filed View Document - Declaration of F Valera Comment of Fernando Valera ISO Request for Default Judgment
  18. Chambers Work - Non-UD CG Judgments Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 5:34 PM Cancel Reason Clerical Error
  19. Chambers Work - Non-UD CG Judgments Original Type Chambers Work - Non-UD CG Judgments Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 5:34 PM Result Heard
  20. Order Denied View Document Order Denying Application for Default Judgment Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Comment Order Denying Application for Default Judgment
  21. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing View Document Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Order Denying Application for Default Judgment ) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on () . Parties served: Jody L. Winter
  22. Dismissal of Doe Defendant(s) View Document 4-14-25 Request for Dismissal of Does 1-50 Comment Without prejudice Does: 1-50
  23. Request for Court Judgment View Document -Request for Court Judgment Comment pending review
  24. Declaration Filed View Document -Declaration of Jennifer Panicker Comment of Jennifer Panicker in Support of Request for Entry of Court Judgment After Default
  25. Declaration Filed View Document -Declaration of Fernando Valera Comment of Fernando Valera in Support of Request for Entry of Court Judgment After Default
  26. Declaration Filed View Document -Declaration of Nancy Estela Cordova Comment of Nancy Estela Cordova in Support of Request for Entry of Court Judgment After Default
  27. Judgment Received View Document -(PROPOSED) COURT JUDGMENT Comment PENDING REVIEW
  28. Chambers Work- Pre Original Type Chambers Work- Pre Judicial Officer Diaz, Maria G Hearing Time 6:00 AM Result Heard
  29. Minute Order Attachment View Document 4-16-25 Chambers Minute Order Attachment Comment Chambers Minute Order
  30. Chambers Work - Non-UD CG Judgments Original Type Chambers Work - Non-UD CG Judgments Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 5:34 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  31. Order Denied View Document Order Denying Application for Default Judgment Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Comment Order Denying Application for Default Judgment
  32. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing View Document Clerks Certificate of Mailing Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Order Denying Application for Default Judgment was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on Parties served: Joyd L Winter
  33. Request for Court Judgment View Document Request for Court Judgment
  34. Declaration Filed View Document Declaration of Jennifer Panicker in Support of Request for Entry Comment of Jennifer Panicker in Support of Request for Entry of Court Judgment After Default
  35. Declaration Filed View Document Declaration of Fernando Valeria in Support Comment of Fernando Valeria in Support of Request for Entry of Court Judgment After Default
  36. Declaration Filed View Document Declaration of Nancy Estela Cordova in Support Comment of Nancy Estela Cordova in Support of Request for Entry of Court Judgment After Default
  37. Judgment Received View Document Judgement Order Comment See order signed
  38. Chambers Work - Non-UD CG Judgments Original Type Chambers Work - Non-UD CG Judgments Judicial Officer Skiles, Jon M Hearing Time 5:34 PM Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  39. Letter Received View Document Letter Received Comment Re: (2) Certified copies of Default Judgment *Processed and mailed in SASE on
  40. Copy Provided To: Comment Lloyd Winter P.C RE: (2) Certified Copies of Default Judgment
  41. Abstract of Judgment Issued View Document Abstract Comment Amount: $37,367.93

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more