Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURIES
- PLAINTIFF'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT THE KROGER COMPANY
- PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT THE KROGER COMPANY
- PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE TO TAKE THE VIDEO-TAPED DEPOSITION OF DEFENDAT JOHN DAVID FOWLKES
- SUMMONS
- SUMMONS
- CASE INITIATION FORM
- SHERIFF RETURN OF SERVICE-PERSONAL TO JOHN D FOWLKES SERVICE ON MARCH 31 2024
- SHERIFF RETURN OF SERVICE-PERSONAL TO JOHN A FOWLKES SERVICE ON MARCH 31 2024
- SHERIFF RETURN OF SERVICE ST24CV0206 KROGER CO CORP SERVED SRS 04/03/2024
- EFILED DOCUMENT:ANSWER FOR DEFENDANT: JOHN D FOWLKES
- EFILED DOCUMENT:DEFENDANT THE KROGER CO.'S ANSWER AND DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
- DEFENDANT THE KROGER CO.'S RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS
- EFILED DOCUMENT:DEFENDANT(S) THE KROGER CO.'S RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL
- PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION (IN PART) TO DEFENDANT THE KROGER COMPANY'S NON-PARTY REQUEST FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
- DEFENDANT THE KROGER CO.'S RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS
- RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE- FOR PL'S 3RD PARTY RPD TO AT&T
- RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE- FOR PL'S RESP TO DEF'S INTERROG & RPD
- PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT, DROP DEFENDANT DAVID FOWLEKS, AND ADD MELISSA AIKENS AS A DEFENDANT TO THIS LAWSUIT
- EFILED DOCUMENT:PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE TO TAKE THE VIDEO-TAPED DEPOSITION OF MELISSA AIKEN
- EFILED DOCUMENT:ORDER TO AMEND THE PLEADINGS AND DROP AND ADD PARTIES
- PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE FOR JEFFREY M WASICK
- DEFENDANT(S) THE KROGER CO.'S RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL
- PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT THE KROGER COMPANYS NON PARTY REQUEST FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTREGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY AND CONSENT TO JURSIDICTION
- DEFENDANT MELISSA AIKENS ANSWER AND DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT
- ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE
- ACKNOWLEDGEMENT REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY AND CONSENT TO JURISDICTION
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE- MATTHEW MOFFETT
- SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL- SARAH LISLE TO REPLACE JEFFREY WASICK FOR DEFENDANTS
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In