Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Stamford County

Court

Stamford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-17
Type T 03 Torts Defective Premises Private Other
Docket 63 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Carol Nieves|Apportionment Plaintiff: Sodexo Operations,llc
Defendant Sodexho, Inc.|Sodexo Operations, Llc|Apportionment Defendant: Unidine Corporation|Apportionment Defendant: Service Management Group Llc

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. APPEARANCE Appearance
  6. APPEARANCE Appearance
  7. APPEARANCE Appearance
  8. APPEARANCE Appearance
  9. APPEARANCE Appearance
  10. RETURN OF SERVICE
  11. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 10/10/2024 HON JOHN KAVANEWSKY
  12. ORDER RESULT: Granted 10/10/2024 HON JOHN KAVANEWSKY
  13. NOTICE NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY TO PLAINITFF
  14. REQUEST TO REVISE
  15. REVISED COMPLAINT
  16. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 11/18/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  17. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/18/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  18. MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY
  19. MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY CORRECTED
  20. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/25/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  21. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION 106.00 Motion to Substitute Party
  22. SCHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES RESULT: Order 7/30/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  23. ORDER RESULT: Order 7/30/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  24. SUBSTITUTED COMPLAINT
  25. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  26. CLAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  27. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR APPORTIONMENT AS SERVED CGS SEC 52-102b
  28. MOTION FOR ORDER MOTION TO COMPEL
  29. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  30. NOTICE of Service of Interrogatories and Requests for Production directed to Service Management Group, LLC
  31. NOTICE of Service of Interrogatories and Requests for Production directed to Unidine Corporation
  32. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD Unidine's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Plead RESULT: Granted 4/7/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  33. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/7/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  34. MOTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD (Against Apportionment Defendant, Service Management Group, LLC) RESULT: Denied 4/23/2025 BY THE CLERK
  35. ORDER RESULT: Denied 4/23/2025 BY THE CLERK
  36. MOTION FOR ORDER MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF?S OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY RESULT: Order 10/20/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  37. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/20/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  38. EXHIBITS (Exhibit To Motion For Order Docket Entry No.120.00 Motion To Compel Missing Discovery)
  39. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE SERVICE MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC Answer & Special Defense to [113.00] Apportionment Complaint
  40. NOTICE Notice pursuant to C.G.S. 52-102b -as to Apportionment Defs-Unidine and Service Mgt Group
  41. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE SERVICE MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC Answer & Special Defense to [123.00] Second Amended Complaint
  42. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE Unidine's Answer and Special Defenses to Sodexo's Apportionment Complaint [113.00]
  43. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE TO PLAINTIFF CAROL NIEVES? SECOND AMENDED REVISED COMPLAINT
  44. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE SERVICE MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC
  45. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22 SMG Notice of RFA to Plaintiff
  46. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22 SMG Notice of RFA to Unidine
  47. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22 SMG Notice of RFA to Sodexho, Inc.
  48. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22 SMG Notice of RFA to Sodexo Operations
  49. WITHDRAWAL 130.00 Requests for Admissions as to Sodexho, Inc.
  50. ANSWER AND/OR OBJECTIONS TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS PB 13-23(a) SODEXO OPERATIONS LLC?S NOTICE OF FILING OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES OF TO SERVICE MANAGEMENT GROUP, LL
  51. NOTICE Unidine's Notice of Filing Responses to D-SMG's RFA Dated 6.25.25
  52. ORDER RESULT: Order 7/30/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  53. NOTICE of Filing Responses to Request to Admit
  54. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Order 8/4/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  55. ORDER RESULT: Order 8/4/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  56. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS DEFENDANT?S DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS/MEDICAL RECORDS TO BE SUBMITTED IN LIEU OF LIVE TESTIMONY
  57. AFFIDAVIT OF MICHELLE NAPOLI RE: NONCOMPLIANCE WITH DISCOVERY
  58. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE by Plaintiff
  59. SCHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES Revised
  60. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) for approval of revised scheduling order [141.00] or status conference RESULT: Order 10/23/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  61. ORDER RESULT: Order 10/23/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  62. AFFIDAVIT SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF MICHELLE NAPOLI
  63. OBJECTION RE DISCOVERY OR DISCLOSURE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more