Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-12
Status Judgment
Type Uifsa
Docket 25 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Scott, Sasha La'trell
Defendant Rangel, Ramiro
Photo of Hon. Pebet Noelle

Judge

Hon. Pebet Noelle

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Income and Expense Declaration
  2. Child Support Transmittal
  3. Confidential Personal Information Form Filed
  4. Proof of Service Comment Served: Ramiro Rangel / Personal Service
  5. Response Comment to: Uniform Support Petition
  6. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the ( Response to Uniform Support Petition was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on (). Parties served: (County of Fresno, DCSS)
  7. Notice of Motion Comment Judgment, CS, Health Care, Parentage, Genetic Testing / HRG: @ 8AM Dept 302
  8. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Date mailed : Served : Ramiro Rangel, Sasha Latrell Scott
  9. Letter of Documents Returned Without Filing Comment Notice and Order Regarding Remote Appearance
  10. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: Scott, Sasha La'Trell Respondent: Rangel, Ramiro
  11. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: Scott, Sasha La'Trell Respondent: Rangel, Ramiro
  12. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: Scott, Sasha La'Trell Respondent: Rangel, Ramiro
  13. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment Parentage Parties Present Petitioner: Scott, Sasha La'Trell Respondent: Rangel, Ramiro
  14. Motion - Genetic Test Original Type Motion - Genetic Test Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Parties Present Petitioner: Scott, Sasha La'Trell Respondent: Rangel, Ramiro
  15. Appeared in Person
  16. Remote Appearance Via Zoom
  17. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Date mailed : - Served : Sasha Latrell Scott
  18. Motion for Entry of Judgment Original Type Motion for Entry of Judgment Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment Cont'd from to allow parties complete GT/results received / RJ 10/1/24 / Ptnr auth Zoom Parties Present Petitioner: Scott, Sasha La'Trell Respondent: Rangel, Ramiro
  19. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Petitioner: Scott, Sasha La'Trell Respondent: Rangel, Ramiro
  20. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Petitioner: Scott, Sasha La'Trell Respondent: Rangel, Ramiro
  21. Motion - Genetic Test Original Type Motion - Genetic Test Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Petitioner: Scott, Sasha La'Trell Respondent: Rangel, Ramiro
  22. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment Parentage Parties Present Petitioner: Scott, Sasha La'Trell Respondent: Rangel, Ramiro
  23. Appeared in Person
  24. Remote Appearance Via Zoom
  25. Confidential document filed Comment Genetic Test Results

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more