Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-01-12
Status Pending
Type 23 Cv Other Pi/pd/wd Civil Unlimited
Docket 29 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Loving, Wonda Jean
Defendant Alford, David
Photo of Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Judge

Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 04/30/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: T2
  2. Unserved
  3. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Case management statement. Reason: The hearing information is incorrect. The case management conference is scheduled on July 15, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Department T-2 "Traffic Courtroom There is an Order to Show Cause CRC 3.110 scheduled on April 30, 2024. Refer to the court's notice of assignment file 1/16/2024
  4. Comment of Diligence as to David Alford, 19 attempts
  5. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 04/30/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued - Court's Motion Hearing
  6. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Substitution of Attorney. Reason: Remove the red box with the "to keep other people from seeing what you entered on your form please press the clear this form button 'message from the top right 'court use only" area. Correct the superior court address to 1215 Truxtun Avenue
  7. Comment Former Attorney: Alivia Abreu, Wilshire Law Firm; New Attorney: Jon Sargsyan
  8. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Order to Show Cause/Case Management Conference 7/15/24 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  9. View Document Order to Show Cause/Case Management Conference 7/15/24 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment continued from 04/30/2024
  10. Comment Re: Imposition of Sanctions Hearing Date: 9/18/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. Hearing Department/Division:T-2
  11. Comment of Jon Sargsyan Esq re: Order to Show Cause re Imposition of Sanctions
  12. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Cont'd from 07/15/24
  13. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Cont'd from 04/30/24
  14. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment re: Sanctions directed to Plaintiff's counsel to show cause why the Court should not impose monetary sanctions $250.00 pursuant to CRC Rule 2.30 for FTA at the OSC and CMC on 07/15/24 and FTC with CRC, Rules 3.110, 3.720 - 3.730

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more