Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Napa County Superior

Court

Napa County Superior

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-16
Status Inactive
Type Uniform Parentage
Docket 37 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bravo, Alejandro Castaneda
Defendant Respondent cobian, Karina
Photo of Hon. Mihm, Maria

Judge

Hon. Mihm, Maria

Napa County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Substitution: Attorney
  2. Summons: Issued and Filed
  3. Fee Waiver Granted
  4. Request for Order: Child Custody or Visitation Comment CUSTODY, VISITATION, DETERMINE PARENTAGE
  5. Order: Orientation (FCS) Comment MOTHER
  6. Order: Orientation (FCS) Comment FATHER
  7. Declaration: Income and Expense
  8. Response or Reply Comment RESPONSIVE DECLARATION TO RFO
  9. Fee Waiver Granted
  10. Notice: Mediation Appointment
  11. Mediation Original Type Mediation Judicial Officer Mihm, Maria Hearing Time 10:30 AM Result Mediation Partial Agreement
  12. Agreement: Mediation Comment PROPOSED To Comm Skelton for review & signature
  13. Agreement: Mediation Comment Partial Agreement re:Custody & Visitation
  14. Proof of Service
  15. Request for Order Hearing Original Type Request for Order Hearing Judicial Officer Skelton, Douglas C. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued Party's Motion: Hearing Comment CUSTODY, VISITATION, PARENTAGE
  16. Notice: Mediation Appointment
  17. Minute Order
  18. Mediation Original Type Mediation Judicial Officer Mihm, Maria Hearing Time 1:30 PM Result Mediation No Agreement
  19. Request for Order Hearing Judicial Officer Skelton, Douglas C. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard Comment Custody, Visitation, Parentage
  20. Minute Order
  21. Declaration: Income and Expense
  22. Request for Order Hearing Judicial Officer Lind, Kecia Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued Party's Motion: Hearing Comment Custody, Visitation, Parentage
  23. Minute Order
  24. Substitution: Attorney
  25. Mediation Judicial Officer Mihm, Maria Hearing Time 10:30 AM
  26. Agreement: Mediation Comment PROPOSED To Atty for Resp. for review & signature
  27. Request for Order Hearing Original Type Request for Order Hearing Judicial Officer Lind, Kecia Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued Party's Motion: Hearing Comment Custody, Visitation and Parentage
  28. Minute Order
  29. Request for Order Hearing Original Type Request for Order Hearing Judicial Officer Lind, Kecia Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard Comment Custody, Visitation and Parentage
  30. Stipulation and Order Comment STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION, AND CHILD SUPPORT
  31. Minute Order
  32. Advisement & Waiver of Rights Comment ALEJANDRO CASTANEDA
  33. Advisement & Waiver of Rights Comment KARINA COBIAN
  34. Stipulation Comment STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT RE DETERMINATION OF PARENTAL RELATIONSHIP
  35. Proof of Service
  36. Judgment
  37. Judgment: Notice of Entry (Family)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more