Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Pinellas County

Court

Pinellas County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-13
Status OPEN
Type Negligence Construction Defect
Docket 101 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Peter Boreyko
Defendant Five Towns Of St Petersburg No 304 Inc|Averys Bricks N Sticks Construction Inc|Dba Right Way Roofing|Right Way Holdings Llc
Photo of Hon. WILLIAMS, AMY M

Judge

Hon. WILLIAMS, AMY M

Pinellas County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. IVIL COVER SHEET - E-FILED Amount: 75001.00
  2. RDER OF REFERRAL
  3. GREED ORDER
  4. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  5. LERK DEFAULT - ENTERED Party: SHALOM ROOFING CORP,
  6. OINT STIPULATION
  7. OTICE OF CANCELLATION
  8. LIAS SUMMONS - SERVED Party: ELOHIM ROOFING SERVICES CORP,
  9. EQUEST
  10. EQUEST
  11. LERK DEFAULT - ENTERED Party: ELOHIM ROOFING SERVICES CORP,
  12. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: SHALOM ROOFING CORP,
  13. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: ELOHIM ROOFING SERVICES CORP,
  14. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  15. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  16. HIRD PARTY SUMMONS - ISSUED Party: ELOHIM ROOFING SERVICES CORP,
  17. RDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
  18. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  19. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Party: RIGHT WAY HOLDINGS LLC,
  20. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - NOT SERVED Party: ELOHIM ROOFING SERVICES CORP,
  21. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: SHALOM ROOFING CORP,
  22. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  23. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  24. OTICE OF MEDIATION CONFERENCE
  25. ITNESS LIST
  26. ITNESS LIST
  27. OTICE OF CANCELLATION
  28. RDER GRANTING
  29. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  30. OTION Party: BOREYKO, PETER
  31. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  32. RIVILEGE LOG
  33. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  34. OTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY
  35. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  36. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  37. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  38. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  39. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  40. HIRD PARTY SUMMONS - ISSUED Party: ELOHIM ROOFING SERVICES CORP,
  41. HIRD PARTY SUMMONS - ISSUED Party: SHALOM ROOFING CORP,
  42. TANDING ORDER ASSIGNING GENERAL CIVIL CASE TRACK
  43. UMMONS - NOT ISSUED
  44. UMMONS - NOT ISSUED
  45. UMMONS - NOT ISSUED Party: TETTERTON, JOHN TAYLOR
  46. UMMONS - NOT ISSUED
  47. OTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY
  48. HIRD PARTY COMPLAINT
  49. UMMONS - NOT ISSUED Party: SHALOM ROOFING CORP,
  50. OTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  51. UMMONS - NOT ISSUED
  52. UMMONS - NOT ISSUED Party: ELOHIM ROOFING SERVICES CORP,
  53. OTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: RIGHT WAY HOLDINGS LLC,
  54. ORRESPONDENCE FROM CLERK RE
  55. GREED ORDER
  56. GREED ORDER
  57. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  58. GREED ORDER
  59. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  60. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  61. OTION Party: RIGHT WAY HOLDINGS LLC,
  62. OTION TO STRIKE Party: RIGHT WAY HOLDINGS LLC,
  63. NSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Party: RIGHT WAY HOLDINGS LLC,
  64. OTION Party: RIGHT WAY HOLDINGS LLC,
  65. ERTIFICATE OF SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY
  66. GREED ORDER
  67. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  68. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  69. ANDATORY CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
  70. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  71. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  72. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  73. OTION TO AMEND Party: BOREYKO, PETER
  74. OTICE OF MEDIATION CONFERENCE
  75. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  76. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  77. EPLY TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  78. NSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Party: AVERYS BRICKS N STICKS CONSTRUCTION INC,
  79. ASE MANAGEMENT STATUS ORDER
  80. RDER OF REFERRAL TO MEDIATION
  81. EQ COURT TO CONSIDER MTN - WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS WITHOUT HRG
  82. OTION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT Party: BOREYKO, PETER
  83. RDER GRANTING
  84. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  85. RDER GRANTING
  86. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  87. OTION TO DISMISS Party: AVERYS BRICKS N STICKS CONSTRUCTION INC,
  88. FFIDAVIT
  89. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Party: AVERYS BRICKS N STICKS CONSTRUCTION INC,
  90. OTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: AVERYS BRICKS N STICKS CONSTRUCTION INC,
  91. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: AVERYS BRICKS N STICKS CONSTRUCTION INC,
  92. MENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
  93. OTICE OF HEARING
  94. TTACHMENT
  95. OTION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT Party: BOREYKO, PETER
  96. LERK DEFAULT - ENTERED Party: FIVE TOWNS OF ST PETERSBURG NO 304 INC,
  97. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: FIVE TOWNS OF ST PETERSBURG NO 304 INC,
  98. UMMONS - ISSUED Party: FIVE TOWNS OF ST PETERSBURG NO 304 INC,
  99. UMMONS - ISSUED Party: AVERYS BRICKS N STICKS CONSTRUCTION INC,
  100. TTACHMENT TO COMPLAINT
  101. OMPLAINT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more