Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-20
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 39 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Us Bank National Association
Defendant Jeremy Daniel Dobranic|Unk Spouse Of Jeremy Daniel Dobranic|Ohio Housing Finance Agency
Photo of Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Judge

Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. PLAINTIFF HAS NOTIFIED THE COURT THAT IS HAS AN INTERNAL HOLD IN PLACE UNTIL 2/1/25 DUE TO AN ACTIVE FORBEARANCE PLAN WITH THE DEFENDANT. DUE TO COURT POLICY THE COURT WILL NOT STAY THE WITHIN CASE FOR SAID LENGTH OF TIME. THE WITHIN CASE REMAINS ACTIVE. PLAINTIFF MUST PROCEED WITH PROSECUTING THE WITHIN CASE AND IT HAS UNTIL 11/21/24 TO FILE OR SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WITH THE COURT. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE COURT DISMISSING THE WITHIN CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE: 1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 2. AFFIDAVIT WITH REGARD TO MILITARY SERVICE 3. A PROPOSED MAGISTRATE'S DECISION 4. UPDATED TITLE WORK 5. AN ATTORNEY'S AFFIDAVIT THAT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS AS OUTLINED ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE 6. A PROPOSED ADOPTION ORDER PLAINTIFF MAY ALSO DISMISS ITS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER CIVIL RULE 41(A) IF IT IS UNABLE TO PROCEED AND IT CAN RE-FILE ITS CASE WHEN ITS OWN INTERNAL HOLD IS NO LONGER IN PLACE. NOTICE ISSUED
  3. NOTICE FILED BY P1 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY F. PETER COSTELLO 0076112 NOTICE OF LOSS MITIGATION STATUS
  4. CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 54629980 ADDRESSED TO UNK SPOUSE OF JEREMY DANIEL DOBRANIC(D2) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  5. ANSWER FILED BY D3 OHIO HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY ATTORNEY MELANIE CORNELIUS 0029808 OHIO HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
  6. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY CASE FILED ON 9/20/23 IS DENIED. RATHER, PLAINTIFF HAS UNTIL 11/7/24 TO UPDATE THE COURT REGARDING LOSS MITIGATION I.E. IF THE PARTIES HAVE ENTERED INTO A LOSS MITIGATION PLAN (OR NOT) AND THE TERMS OF THE PLAN I.E. WHAT MONTHS AND HOW MUCH IS EACH PAYMENT PER MONTH. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO NOTIFY THE COURT IN WRITING BY 11/7/24 MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. MOTION FILED FOR P1 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION F. PETER COSTELLO 0076112 MOTION TO STAY CASE 10/08/2024 - DENIED
  8. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED TO THE CLERK OF COURTS, FILED.
  9. 54629917 ON 08/29/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED UNK SPOUSE OF JEREMY DANIEL DOBRANIC BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  10. 54629916 ON 08/29/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED DOBRANIC/JEREMY/DANIEL BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  11. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54629981 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/05/2024 OHIO HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY PROCESSED BY COC 09/11/2024.
  12. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54629979 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/31/2024 DOBRANIC/JEREMY/DANIEL PROCESSED BY COC 09/04/2024.
  13. SUMS COMPLAINT(54629981) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: OHIO HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY 2600 CORPORATE EXCHANGE DRIVE SUITE 300 COLUMBUS, OH 43231
  14. SUMS COMPLAINT(54629980) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNK SPOUSE OF JEREMY DANIEL DOBRANIC 3706 HENRITZE AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44109
  15. SUMS COMPLAINT(54629979) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JEREMY DANIEL DOBRANIC 3706 HENRITZE AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44109
  16. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  18. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. WRIT FEE
  20. WRIT FEE
  21. WRIT FEE
  22. SUMS COMPLAINT(54629917) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: UNK SPOUSE OF JEREMY DANIEL DOBRANIC 3706 HENRITZE AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44109
  23. SUMS COMPLAINT(54629916) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JEREMY DANIEL DOBRANIC 3706 HENRITZE AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44109
  24. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  25. WRIT FEE
  26. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  27. WRIT FEE
  28. MAGISTRATE JOHN T DYKE ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  29. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  30. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  31. JUDGE KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  32. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  33. LEGAL RESEARCH
  34. LEGAL NEWS
  35. LEGAL AID
  36. COMPUTER FEE
  37. CLERK'S FEE
  38. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID F. PETER COSTELLO
  39. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID F. PETER COSTELLO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more