Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-27
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 70 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Wilmington Savings Fund Society Fsb, Not In Its Individual Capacity, But Solely As Trustee Of Mfa 2023 Inv 1 Trust
Defendant Clara St, Llc|Christopher Wells|City Of Euclid|Cuyahoga Clerk Of Courts|Ftf Lending, Llc|State Of Ohio, Department Of Taxation
Photo of Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Judge

Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54670278 RETURNED 10/8/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WELLS/CHRISTOPHER/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  3. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54670276 RETURNED 10/8/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT CLARA ST, LLC - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995692) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: FTF LENDING, LLC C/O CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, S/A 4400 EASTON CMNS, SUITE 125 COLUMBUS, OH 43219
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995691) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CUYAHOGA CLERK OF COURTS 1200 ONTARIO STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  6. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995690) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CHRISTOPHER WELLS 7924 SILVER LAKE COURT WESTERVILLE, OH 43802
  7. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995689) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CLARA ST, LLC 7924 SILVER LAKE COURT WESTERVILLE, OH 43082
  8. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995688) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DONALD BRETT BRYSON [email protected]
  9. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995687) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DONALD BRETT BRYSON [email protected]
  10. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995686) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CORY STEINMETZ [email protected]
  11. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995685) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG [email protected]
  12. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995684) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG [email protected]
  13. UDGMENT ENTRY(54995680) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: LAURA KRAMER RUBADUE [email protected]
  14. URSUANT TO PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL FILED HEREIN, THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF'S COSTS. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54670279 RETURNED 09/09/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WELLS/CHRISTOPHER/ - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  16. OTICE FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY DONALD BRETT BRYSON 0096538 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
  17. NSWER OF CITY OF EUCLID . LAURA KRAMER RUBADUE (0067656)
  18. NSWER FILED BY D6 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION ATTORNEY CORY STEINMETZ 0092319 THE STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
  19. NSWER FILED BY D3 CITY OF EUCLID ATTORNEY LAURA KRAMER RUBADUE 0067656 ANSWER OF CITY OF EUCLID
  20. UMS COMPLAINT(54785242) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CHRISTOPHER WELLS P.O. BOX 17224 DAYTON, OH 45417-0000 ANSWER DATE: 10/09/2024
  21. RIT FEE
  22. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  23. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY DONALD BRETT BRYSON 0096538 NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  24. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE
  25. SPS RECEIPT NO. 54670284 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/04/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 09/11/2024.
  26. SPS RECEIPT NO. 54670283 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/03/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 09/11/2024.
  27. SPS RECEIPT NO. 54670282 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/03/2024 FTF LENDING, LLC PROCESSED BY COC 09/11/2024.
  28. SPS RECEIPT NO. 54670280 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/03/2024 CITY OF EUCLID PROCESSED BY COC 09/11/2024.
  29. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54670279 RETURNED 9/9/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WELLS/CHRISTOPHER/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  30. SPS RECEIPT NO. 54670277 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/31/2024 CLARA ST, LLC PROCESSED BY COC 09/04/2024.
  31. UMS COMPLAINT(54670284) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 150 EAST GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  32. UMS COMPLAINT(54670283) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION 4485 NORTHLAND RIDGE BLVD COLUMBUS, OH 43229-0000
  33. UMS COMPLAINT(54670282) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: FTF LENDING, LLC C/O CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, S/A 4400 EASTON CMNS, SUITE 125 COLUMBUS, OH 43219
  34. UMS COMPLAINT(54670280) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CITY OF EUCLID 585 EAST 222ND STREET EUCLID, OH 44123
  35. UMS COMPLAINT(54670279) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CHRISTOPHER WELLS P.O. BOX 17224 DAYTON, OH 45417-0000
  36. UMS COMPLAINT(54670278) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CHRISTOPHER WELLS 7924 SILVER LAKE COURT WESTERVILLE, OH 43802
  37. UMS COMPLAINT(54670277) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CLARA ST, LLC C/O CHRISTOPHER M. WELLS, S/A 752 NORTH STATE STREET, SUITE 419 WESTERVILLE, OH 43082-0000
  38. UMS COMPLAINT(54670276) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CLARA ST, LLC 7924 SILVER LAKE COURT WESTERVILLE, OH 43082
  39. UMS COMPLAINT(54670281) SENT BY CLERK ISSUED VIA HAND DELIVERY. TO: CUYAHOGA CLERK OF COURTS 1200 ONTARIO STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  40. LERK ISSUED VIA HAND DELIVERY RETURNED 08/28/2024 - CUYAHOGA CLERK OF COURTS - COMPLETED 08/28/2024 0.00
  41. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  42. RIT FEE
  43. RIT FEE
  44. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  45. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  46. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  47. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  48. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  49. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  50. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  51. RIT FEE
  52. RIT FEE
  53. RIT FEE
  54. RIT FEE
  55. RIT FEE
  56. RIT FEE
  57. RIT FEE
  58. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  59. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  60. AGISTRATE MONICA KLEIN ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  61. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  62. UDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  63. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  64. EGAL RESEARCH
  65. EGAL NEWS
  66. EGAL AID
  67. OMPUTER FEE
  68. LERK'S FEE
  69. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG
  70. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more