Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Travis County

Court

Travis County

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-09-21
Status Closed
Type Breach Of Contract
Docket 49 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Schwerman, Edwin|Staniszewski, Corrie
Defendant Staniszewski, Corrie|Schwerman, Edwin

Docket Entries

  1. FINAL OR PARTIAL DISPOSITION ORDER (Judicial Officer: SULAK, TIMOTHY M) FINAL JUDGMENT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
  3. NEW:ORIGINAL PETITION/APPL (OCA) Event Code: 4500
  5. ASM:GN CIVIL PETITION Event Code: 600 Adjmt Amount: 307.00 Party: Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, EDWIN
  7. ASM:CITATION ISSUE Event Code: 702 Adjmt Amount: 16.00 Party: Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, EDWIN
  9. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANTS ORIGINAL ANSWER Party: Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, ROBERT; Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, CORRIE
  11. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANTS AMENDED ANSWER, AND COUNTERCLAIM Party: Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, ROBERT; Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, CORRIE
  13. MOTION DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS SUIT PER RULE 91a, TRCP
  15. MOTION DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Party: Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, ROBERT; Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, CORRIE
  17. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANTS 2nd AMENDED ANSWER, AND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
  19. NOTICE CIVIL DISTRICT COURT ANNOUNCEMENT FORM
  21. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO TEX. R. CIV. P. 91a Party: Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, EDWIN; Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, KARIN
  23. MOTION PLAINTIFFS RULE 91a MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS Party: Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, EDWIN; Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, KARIN
  25. OTHER/NOTICE PROPOSED ORDER
  27. PLEADING DEFENDANTS SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO DISMISS SUIT PER RULE 91a,TRCP Party: Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, ROBERT
  29. NOTICE NOTICE OF REMOTE HEARING ON THE CENTRAL DOCKET
  31. NOTICE NOTICE TO USE ALTERNATE EMAIL FOR THIS CAUSE Party: Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, ROBERT; Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, CORRIE
  33. NOTICE NOTICE OF REMOTE HEARING ON THE CENTRAL DOCKET Party: Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, ROBERT; Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, CORRIE
  35. ORDER DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF NONSUIT OF COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINSTPLAINTIFFS Party: Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, ROBERT; Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, CORRIE
  36. OTHER/NOTICE CIVIL DISTRICT COURT ANNOUNCEMENT FORM
  37. OTHER/NOTICE PROPSOED ORDER
  38. JUDGMENT NOTICE MAILED
  39. ORDER (Judicial Officer: CONNOR, MADELEINE) ORDER ON DEFENDANTS RULE 91A MOTION TO DISMISS Party: Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, EDWIN; Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, KARIN Party 2: Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, ROBERT; Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, CORRIE
  40. OTHER/NOTICE RETURN MAIL- NOTICE OF ORDER
  41. NOTICE NOTICE OF TRIAL SETTING Party: Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, EDWIN; Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, KARIN
  42. MOTION PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR SPOLIATION SANCTIONS Party: Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, EDWIN; Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, KARIN
  43. OTHER/NOTICE PLAINTIFFS PRETRIAL DISCLOSURES
  44. PLEADING DEFENDANTS COUNTERCLAIM Party: Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, ROBERT; Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, CORRIE
  45. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF REMOTE HEARING ON THE CENTRAL DOCKET Party: Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, EDWIN; Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, KARIN
  46. MOTION PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS COUNTERCLAIM Party: Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, EDWIN; Counter-Defendant, Plaintiff SCHWERMAN, KARIN
  47. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SPOLIATION SANCTIONS
  48. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS COUNTERCLAIM Party: Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, ROBERT; Counter-Plaintiff, Defendant STANISZEWSKI, CORRIE
  49. CVD: FINAL JUDGMENT (OCA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more