Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of New Britain County

Court

New Britain County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-11
Type T 90 Torts All Other
Docket 22 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Edvan Cruz
Defendant Litt Entertainment Group, Llc. D/b/a Litt Ultra Lounge|Non Appearing|Christine Lavorgna|Aj Consulting Tri State, Llc.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. BJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME re: entry 116.00
  2. OMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. ETURN OF SERVICE
  5. OTICE TO ALL PARTIES discovery addressed to plf
  6. MENDED WRIT AND SUMMONS Amended Summons as Matter of Right
  7. MENDED COMPLAINT Amended Complaint as Matter of Right
  8. MENDED COMPLAINT Second Amended Complaint as Matter of Right
  9. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  10. OTICE OF BANKRUPTCY
  11. RDER scheduling order due RESULT: Order 4/23/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  12. RDER scheduling order due RESULT: Order 5/16/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  13. CHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Order 5/19/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  14. RDER RESULT: Order 5/19/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  15. EQUEST TO REVISE as to plaintiff's Amended Complaint #104
  16. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MET to Respond to Request to Revise RESULT: Granted 7/21/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  17. RDER RESULT: Granted 7/21/2025 HON ERIC SMITH
  18. OTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE - PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD - 13-6/13-9)
  19. BJECTION TO MOTION FOR NONSUIT
  20. OTICE Notice of Filing I&Ps Forms 201 and 204
  21. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  22. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 2nd MET to Request to Revise

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more