Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Docket Entries
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- Judmt Full Order Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Original Expiration Date - 09/09/2025; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Terms of additional orders - RESPONDENT SHALL NOT BE WITHIN 100 FEET OF PROTECTED CHILD PIZZA HUT OR BROOKFIELD R-III SCHOOL;
- Tried by Court-Civil
- Full Order of Protection Document ID: 24-CP20-3, for ANDERSON, NICHOLAS DEWAYNE. Copy sent to LCSD for service on respondent. Copy sent to Petitioner, VA and dispatch. sm
- Order Petitioner appears. Respondent does not appear. Court takes up matter and makes findings consistent with the Order. Court orders the Child Order of Protection to be entered. TAW
- Child Protection Hearing Held Associated Entries: 09/03/2024 - Child Prot Hrng Scheduled Scheduled For: 09/10/2024; 1:00 PM; TRACEY A MASON-WHITE; Linn
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- Ord of Protection Served
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- Child Prot Hrng Scheduled Associated Entries: 09/10/2024 - Child Protection Hearing Held Scheduled For: 09/10/2024; 1:00 PM; TRACEY A MASON-WHITE; Linn
- Judge Assigned
- <td></td><td></td><td></td>
- ExParte Order of Protection Resp not to abuse stalk molest - YES; Resp not to enter or stay - YES; Resp not to communicate w/Petp - YES; Additional orders by Court - YES; Terms of additional orders - RESPONDENT SHALL NOT BE WITH FEET OF THE PROTECTED CHILD
- Ex Parte Order Issued AFTER HOURS
- Confid Filing Info Sheet Filed
- Pet for Protection Ord Filed PET Relationship to RES - ACQUAINTANCE Filed By: Petitioner Acting Pro Se
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In