Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-04-16
Status 04/16/2024
Type Protective Proceedings (3 Kn)|Financial Abuse Ex Parte Protective Proceeding
Docket 29 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Hinkle, Jason
Defendant Hinkle, Mark
Photo of Hon. Gist Jason M

Judge

Hon. Gist Jason M

Ketchikan Gateway Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. his case is a protective proceeding. The case is confidential except for those documents listed in AS 13.26.013. Court hearings in this case are generally confidential and not open to the public unless the protected person requests to have the hearing open to the public under AS 13.26.113(a)
  2. etition for Long-Term Order for Protection from Financial Abuse
  3. Day Ex Parte Order of Protection from Financial Abuse
  4. rocess Issued Agency Issued to: Kenai AST/Judicial Services Agency Location: Kenai Protective Order Short Term issued on: 04/16/2024 For: Hinkle, Mark
  5. ttorney Information Attorney Bryan, Sarah Kathryn representing Petitioner Hinkle, Jason as of 04/19/2024
  6. ttorney Information Attorney Mery, Noah representing Protected Person Hinkle, Karen as of 04/19/2024
  7. ttorney Information Attorney Redmond, Sonja representing Respondent Hinkle, Mark as of 04/25/2024
  8. ntry of Appearance Attorney: Bryan, Sarah Kathryn (2211092) Jason Hinkle (Petitioner);
  9. equest for Continuance Attorney: Redmond, Sonja (0605022) Filing Party: Hinkle, Mark Case Motion #1
  10. equest for Modification of Order Attorney: Redmond, Sonja (0605022) Filing Party: Hinkle, Mark Case Motion #2
  11. pposition to Motion to Modify Protective Order Case Motion #2: Request for Modificatino of Order
  12. rder Granting Motion Hinkle, Mark Case Motion #1 Request for Continuance
  13. rocess Issued Bail Amount (Warrants Only): $ Agency Issued to: Agency Location: Kenai Extended Short Term Protective Order issued on: 04/29/2024 For: Hinkle, Mark
  14. eturn of Service Date of Service: 04/16/2024 Mark Hinkle (Respondent);
  15. roposed Order Not Used (Linked to Motion) Hinkle, Mark Case Motion #2 Request for Modificatino of Order
  16. ntry of Appearance Jason Hinkle (Petitioner);
  17. rocess Issued Bail Amount (Warrants Only): $ Agency Issued to: Agency Location: Kenai Extended Short Term Protective Order issued on: 05/21/2024 For: Hinkle, Mark
  18. Day Ex Parte Order of Protection from Financial Abuse
  19. D/Tape Duplication Receipt: 2190413 Date: 05/29/2024
  20. Day Ex Parte Order Of Protection From Financial Abuse
  21. rocess Issued Bail Amount (Warrants Only): $ Agency Issued to: Agency Location: Kenai Extended Short Term Protective Order issued on: 06/10/2024 For: Hinkle, Mark
  22. enial Order
  23. rder Denying Petition for Long-Term Order
  24. ase Closed
  25. D/Tape Duplication Receipt: 2207701 Date: 08/01/2024
  26. opies Made per Admin Rule 9 (e)(1) For a single document or portion of a document $5 If copies of multiple documents are requested at the same time, for each additional document (after the first) $3 Receipt: 2209553 Date: 08/08/2024
  27. D/Tape Duplication Receipt: 2209553 Date: 08/08/2024
  28. xhibit and Deposition Notice to: Redmond, Bryan All items not picked up by the date stated in the notice will be disposed of pursuant to Administrative Bulletin No. 9. Exhibit and Deposition Notice (12/18) Sent on: 08/21/2025 11:42:54.68
  29. eceipt for Exhibits/Depositions Sonja Redmond (Attorney) on behalf of Mark Hinkle (Respondent)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more