Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-05
Status INACTIVE
Type Commercial Docket W Foreclosure
Docket 47 entries

Parties

Plaintiff U.s. Bank Trust National Association As Trustee For Grove Funding Ii Trust
Defendant Gil Equity Group Llc|Alberto Gil
Photo of Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Judge

Hon. JOHN P O'DONNELL

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, SERVICE REQUEST, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. EGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 55754370 RETURNED 01/16/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT GIL/ALBERTO/ VACANT NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(55754370) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: ALBERTO GIL 12112 BUCKINGHAM AVE. CLEVELAND, OH 44102
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(55754369) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: GIL EQUITY GROUP LLC 85-50 FOREST PARKWAY, APT 6F WOODHAVEN, NY 11421
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(55754368) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DANIEL A COX [email protected]
  6. UDGMENT ENTRY(55754367) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DANIEL A COX [email protected]
  7. LAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS UNDER RULE 41(A)(2) IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (FINAL) COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. OTION TO DISMISS FILED MOTION TO DISMISS
  9. REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS THAT PLAINTIFF HAS PERFECTED SERVICE ON ALL DEFENDANTS. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO SUBMIT, WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ANY DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS NECESSARY TO PROSECUTE THE CASE, UPDATED TITLEWORK, AND ANY NECESSARY AFFIDAVITS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55057217 RETURNED 11/14/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT GIL/ALBERTO/ - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  11. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 55057217 RETURNED 11/14/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT GIL/ALBERTO/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  12. OTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED
  13. UMS COMPLAINT(55057217) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ALBERTO GIL 41 E. NORTH ST CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000
  14. REVIEW OF THE DOCKET REVEALS PLAINTIFF FILED A COMPLAINT ON 9/5/24, AND SERVICE HAS NOT YET BEEN PERFECTED. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO PERFECT SERVICE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E), OR THE PLEADING WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. UMS COMPLAINT(55058006) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: ALBERTO GIL 41 E. NORTH ST CARLISLE, PA 17013-0000
  16. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. RIT FEE
  18. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. RIT FEE
  20. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED WRITTEN REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
  21. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED WRITTEN REQUEST FOR PROCESS SERVICE
  22. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54741218 RETURNED 09/11/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT GIL/ALBERTO/ - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  23. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. NOTICE ISSUED
  24. SPS RECEIPT NO. 54741217 DELIVERED BY USPS 09/19/2024 GIL EQUITY GROUP LLC PROCESSED BY COC 09/25/2024.
  25. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54741218 RETURNED 9/11/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT GIL/ALBERTO/ - VACANT NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  26. UMS COMPLAINT(54741218) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ALBERTO GIL 12112 BUCKINGHAM AVE. CLEVELAND, OH 44102
  27. UMS COMPLAINT(54741217) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: GIL EQUITY GROUP LLC 85-50 FOREST PARKWAY, APT 6F WOODHAVEN, NY 11421
  28. UMS COMPLAINT(54741220) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: ALBERTO GIL 12112 BUCKINGHAM AVE. CLEVELAND, OH 44102
  29. UMS COMPLAINT(54741219) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: GIL EQUITY GROUP LLC 85-50 FOREST PARKWAY, APT 6F WOODHAVEN, NY 11421
  30. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  31. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  32. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  33. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  34. RIT FEE
  35. RIT FEE
  36. RIT FEE
  37. RIT FEE
  38. UDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM); COMMERCIAL DOCKET CASE, REASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN P O'DONNELL (RANDOM)
  39. UDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  40. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  41. EGAL RESEARCH
  42. EGAL NEWS
  43. EGAL AID
  44. OMPUTER FEE
  45. LERK'S FEE
  46. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DANIEL A COX
  47. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DANIEL A COX

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more