Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Mahoning County

Court

Mahoning County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-18
Status CLOSED
Type Civil Canfield
Docket 26 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Lvnv Funding Llc
Defendant Accordino, Robert
Photo of Hon. Johnson Molly K

Judge

Hon. Johnson Molly K

Mahoning County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. $0.00
  2. Issue Date: 07/22/2024 Service: SUMMONS ISSUED Method: (CNF) CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $ ACCORDINO, ROBERT 95 HILLTOP BLVD CANFIELD, OH 44406 Tracking No: 9414726699042225724308
  3. SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : (CNF) CERTIFIED MAIL Issued : 07/22/2024 Service : SUMMONS ISSUED Served : 07/23/2024 Return : 07/29/2024 On : ACCORDINO, ROBERT Signed By : SIGNATURE NOT READABLE Reason : (CNF) SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Comment : Tracking #: 9414726699042225724308
  4. MOTION/LEAVE TO PLEAD FILED BY DEFENDANT ROBERT ACCORDINO AND JUDGMENT ENTRY FILED VIA FAX Attorney: WHITE, MARTIN F (9584)
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY SIGNED /S/ JUDGE MOLLY K JOHNSON THIS CAUSE CAME ON FOR HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO MOVE OR PLEAD TO THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE REQUEST IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT SHALL MOVE OR PLEAD TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFOER SEPTEMBER 19, 2024. IT IS SO ORDERED A COPY OF THE ENTRY WAS MAILED TO ATTORNEYS OF RECORD Attorney: WHITE, MARTIN F (9584)
  6. ANSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT ROBERT ACCORDINO Attorney: WHITE, MARTIN F (9584)
  7. HEARING SCHEDULED Event: CIVIL PRE-TRIAL (C) Date: 10/25/2024 Time: 9:00 am Judge: JOHNSON, MOLLY K Location: COUNTY COURT # 5
  8. IF BENCH TRIAL: COUNSEL PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: PRESENT COUNSEL PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT: PRESENT DISCOVERY COMPLETED: NO DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED IN: 60 DAYS DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, IF ANY, IN: 90 DAYS TRIAL TO: BENCH SET FOR BENCH TRIAL IN: 120 DAYS OTHER: /S/ MKJ
  9. HEARING SCHEDULED Event: CIVIL TRIAL (C) Date: 02/28/2025 Time: 9:00 am Judge: JOHNSON, MOLLY K Location: COUNTY COURT # 5 Result: CANCELLED
  10. HEARING SCHEDULED Event: NON ORAL HEARING Date: 02/28/2025 Time: 9:00 am Judge: JOHNSON, MOLLY K Location: COUNTY COURT # 5
  11. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT INSTANTER AND ORDER FILED PROPOSED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ENTRY FILED Attorney: BAKSH, SAMEERAH (103967)
  12. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PROPOSED ENTRY FILED BY: Attorney: URBAN, MEGAN (81543)
  13. ORDER: UPON APPLICATION OF PAINTIFF, AND FOR GOOD CAUSES SHOWN, PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT INSTANTER. SO ORDERED JUDGE: MKJ Attorney: URBAN, MEGAN (81543)
  14. SUMMARY JUDGMENT GRANTED TO THE PLAINTIFF IN THE AMOUNT: $10,894.62 INTEREST FROM: FEBRUARY 28, 2025 INTEREST RATE: 8% AND COSTS. /S/ JUDGE MKJ
  15. CONSENT JUDGEMENT ENTRY FILED BY PARTIES Attorney: URBAN, MEGAN (81543) Attorney: WHITE, MARTIN F (9584)
  16. SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT - THE WITHIN JUDGMENT HAS BEEN FULLY PAID AND IS HEREWITH SATISFIED OF RECORD Attorney: URBAN, MEGAN (81543)
  17. SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT - THE WITHIN JUDGMENT HAS BEEN FULLY PAID AND IS HEREWITH SATISFIED OF RECORD Attorney: URBAN, MEGAN (81543)
  18. $125.00
  19. $0.00
  20. $0.00
  21. $0.00
  22. $0.00
  23. $0.00
  24. $0.00
  25. $0.00
  26. $0.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more