Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-12
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 77 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Wilmington Savings Fund Society Fsb, Not In Its Individual Capacity, But Solely As Trustee Of Mfa 2021 Inv 2 Trust
Defendant Overproof Investments, Llc
Photo of Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Judge

Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. LERK TO HOLD SALE FUNDS FOR COST AND OR FUTURE ORDER OF THE COURT $23,864.99
  3. ASE REFUND TO REIMER LAW CO.
  4. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID SHERIFF
  5. EPOSIT REQUIRED FOR COURT COST TO CLERK $1,193.82 SHERIFF
  6. O COURT: 09/16/2025 ORDER OF SALE RETURNED ENDORSED ADVERT, & SOLD TO: BLUDOOR LIVING LLC ........................................................................................... FOR $84,100.00 DATE OF SALE 01/27/2025 (SEE ATTACHED IMAGE FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS BY SHERIFF)
  7. OTION FILED FOR ADAM D. JUTTE 0081671 MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT IN CONTEMPT, FILED 08/04/2025, IS WITHDRAWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. OTICE FILED BY ATTORNEY HANNAH F.G. SINGERMAN 0083106 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWING MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT IN CONTEMPT
  9. OTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/03/2025 AT 04:00 PM IS CANCELLED.
  10. OTION HEARING SET FOR 09/03/2025 AT 04:00 PM. THIS MATTER IS SET FOR AN IN PERSON HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT IN CONTEMPT. ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL ARE TO REPORT TO THE 6TH FLOOR OF COURTHOUSE SQUARE, 310 WEST. LAKESIDE AVENUE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44113. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. UYAHOGA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT -- SHERIFF SERVICE ISSUED TO OMAR SULEIMAN-- SERVICE FEE $38.00
  12. LERK FEE MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT IN CONTEMPT
  13. OTION FILED FOR ADAM D. JUTTE 0081671 MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT IN CONTEMPT
  14. EGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 56911425 RETURNED 05/21/2025 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT OVERPROOF INVESTMENTS, LLC ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  15. UDGMENT ENTRY(56911425) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: OVERPROOF INVESTMENTS, LLC 6828 INDIANA AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44105
  16. UDGMENT ENTRY(56911424) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOSHUA J. EPLING [email protected]
  17. UDGMENT ENTRY(56911423) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOSHUA J. EPLING [email protected]
  18. UDGMENT ENTRY(56911422) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG [email protected]
  19. UDGMENT ENTRY(56911421) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG [email protected]
  20. ECREE OF CONFIRMATION (Parcel(s) #13221091) THE SHERIFF HAVING SOLD THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER OF SALE ISSUED TO HIM, THE COURT BEING SATISFIED OF THE LEGALITY OF THE SALE AND THAT THE NOTICE OF THE SALE WAS IN ALL RESPECTS IN CONFORMITY TO LAW, APPROVES AND CONFIRMS THE SAME AND DIRECTS THE SHERIFF TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER TO BLUDOOR LIVING LLC A GOOD AND SUFFICIENT DEED THEREOF. UPON FULL PAYMENT OF THE PURCHASE PRICE, THE PURCHASER WILL BE ENTITLED TO A WRIT OF POSSESSION AGAINST ALL PARTY DEFENDANTS. ALL UNDISPUTED STATE LIENS ARE PROTECTED AS PROVIDED IN R.C. SEC. 2329.192. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS MUST SERVE, IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B), ALL PARTIES NOT IN DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR NOTICE OF THIS JUDGMENT AND ITS DATE OF ENTRY UPON THE JOURNAL AND MUST NOTE THE SERVICE ON THE APPEARANCE DOCKET. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO AMEND DISTRIBUTION ORDER IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. ORDER SEE JOURNAL. NOTICE ISSUED
  22. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME, FILED 02/10/2025, IS GRANTED. NOTICE ISSUED
  23. OST JUDGMENT MOTION $30 JOSHUA J. EPLING (0079568) MOTION TO AMEND DISTRIBUTION
  24. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JOSHUA J. EPLING
  25. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
  26. OS ORDER OF SALE RETURNED 1/29/2025, SOLD DATE 1/27/2025 SOLD TO: BLUDOOR LIVING LLC FOR $84,100.00
  27. ROOF OF PUBLICATION FILED. PUBLICATION COST OF $641.20 PREPAID TO LEGAL NEWS.
  28. ECORDER'S FEE $1.00
  29. ERTIFICATE OF TITLE $471.00 PAY TO REIMER, ARNOVITZ, CHERNEK & JEFFREY
  30. OTICE OF SALE AND APPROVAL OF APPRAISERS' FEES. THE SALE IS SCHEDULED FOR 01/27/2025 AT 9:00 A.M. AT CUYAHOGA.SHERIFFSALEAUCTION.OHIO.GOV. IF NOT SOLD ON 01/27/2025 IT WILL BE RE-OFFERED ON 02/10/2025 PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT EACH APPRAISER NAMED BE COMPENSATED BY THE CLERK OF COURTS, FROM THE FUNDS ON DEPOSIT AS FOLLOWS: JOHN J. LYNCH, APPRAISAL COST: $52.78 REGULAR FEE AND MILEAGE. DANIEL J ROCCO, APPRAISAL COST: $50 REGULAR FEE. CRYSTAL A WILLIAMS, APPRAISAL COST: $50 REGULAR FEE. FEES TO BE TAXED AS COSTS IN CASE NO. CV-24-102054 DATED THIS 23rd DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 NOTICE ISSUED NOTICE ISSUED
  31. OTICE FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY JOSHUA J. EPLING 0079568 NOTICE OF SALE
  32. AND APPRAISAL OOS
  33. RDER OF SALE ISSUED TO TO SHERIFF WITH APPRAISAL Parcel#(s) 132-21-091
  34. EGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 55554840 RETURNED 12/17/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT OVERPROOF INVESTMENTS, LLC ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  35. EAL AUCTION
  36. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JOSHUA J. EPLING
  37. RAECIPE FOR ORDER OF SALE $820 PRAECIPE FOR ORDER OF SALE
  38. UDGMENT ENTRY(55554840) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: OVERPROOF INVESTMENTS, LLC 6828 INDIANA AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44105
  39. UDGMENT ENTRY(55554839) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOSHUA J. EPLING [email protected]
  40. UDGMENT ENTRY(55554838) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOSHUA J. EPLING [email protected]
  41. UDGMENT ENTRY(55554837) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG [email protected]
  42. UDGMENT ENTRY(55554836) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG [email protected]
  43. RDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S DECISION AND DECREE OF FORECLOSURE. ORDER SEE JOURNAL. FINAL. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  44. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(55224852) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: OVERPROOF INVESTMENTS, LLC C/O UNITED STATES CORP. AGENTS, S/A 1991 CROCKER ROAD #600-755 WESTLAKE, OH 44145-0000
  45. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(55206813) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: OVERPROOF INVESTMENTS, LLC 6828 INDIANA AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44105
  46. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(55206812) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG [email protected]
  47. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(55206811) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG [email protected]
  48. AGISTRATE'S DECISION(55206808) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOSHUA J. EPLING [email protected]
  49. AGISTRATE'S DECISION WITH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FILED AND SENT TO ALL PARTIES ON SERVICE PAGE.
  50. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, FILED 09/17/2024, IS GRANTED. NOTICE ISSUED
  51. ASE CALLED FOR HEARING. ONLY PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL. NO COURT REPORTER, BUT DIGITALLY RECORDED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION TO ISSUE. NOTICE ISSUED
  52. OTICE FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY JOSHUA J. EPLING 0079568 NOTICE OF HEARING
  53. ELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING SET FOR 10/30/2024 AT 10:00 AM. THE CASE IS SET FOR TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE DEFAULT HEARING BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE HEARING. THE PARTY MOVING FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE DEFAULT HEARING AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE. NOTICE ISSUED
  54. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54541680 RETURNED 09/21/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT OVERPROOF INVESTMENTS, LLC - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  55. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54541680 RETURNED 9/21/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT OVERPROOF INVESTMENTS, LLC - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  56. ENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY JOSHUA J. EPLING 0079568 FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT
  57. FFIDAVIT FILED BY P1 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY ATTORNEY JOSHUA J. EPLING 0079568 ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT
  58. OTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 10/30/2024 - GRANTED
  59. SPS RECEIPT NO. 54541681 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/16/2024 OVERPROOF INVESTMENTS, LLC PROCESSED BY COC 08/21/2024.
  60. UMS COMPLAINT(54541681) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: OVERPROOF INVESTMENTS, LLC C/O UNITED STATES CORP. AGENTS, S/A 1991 CROCKER ROAD #600-755 WESTLAKE, OH 44145-0000
  61. UMS COMPLAINT(54541680) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: OVERPROOF INVESTMENTS, LLC 6828 INDIANA AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44105
  62. AGISTRATE BRIAN S GOZELANCZYK ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  63. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  64. RIT FEE
  65. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  66. RIT FEE
  67. UDGE JOHN D SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  68. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  69. EGAL RESEARCH
  70. EGAL NEWS
  71. EGAL AID
  72. OMPUTER FEE
  73. LERK'S FEE
  74. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG
  75. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG
  76. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  77. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more