Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- Event - Case closed
- Notice-Incoming - Record completion notice from district court
- Notice-Outgoing - Docketing letter (E-Served via CTEF)
- Brief - Appellant (Brief was submitted in three different filings, combined by Clerk's Office)
- Event - Hardcopy received - Brief of Appellant; and received copy of designation of record on appeal
- Brief - Appellees and Guardian Ad Litem (designation of record removed from filing, not supreme court pleading) (Brief contains unredacted material and is therefore marked confidential)
- Notice-Incoming - Copy of designation of record (appellees & guardian ad litem)
- Event - Hardcopy received - Brief of Appellees and Guardian ad Litem
- Notice-Outgoing - Notice of case maturity
- Notice-Outgoing - Request for transmitted record on appeal
- Order - Oral argument scheduled
- Notice-Outgoing - Receipt acknowledgment - oral argument setting (complete and return to clerk's office by email)
- Notice-Incoming - Record transmittal notice from district court
- Record - Transmitted electronic record on appeal via DAPR containing designated pleadings (TR-2-111), transcript (1) and exhibits (4).
- Motion - Oral argument - vacate
- Order - Vacating setting for oral argument (Will be rescheduled for February 2025)
- Event - Hardcopy received - Stipulated and Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Reset
- Order - Oral argument scheduled
- Notice-Outgoing - Receipt acknowledgment - oral argument setting (Complete and return by email to Clerk's office)
- Notice-Incoming - Receipt acknowledgment - oral argument setting received from Joshua Merseal obo appellant
- Event - E-mail correspondence to S. Rostad and N. Martinez to request completed OA acknowledgments.
- Notice-Incoming - Receipt acknowledgment - oral argument setting from S. Rostad obo appellees
- Notice-Internal - Oral argument notice argued before Chief Justice Fox; Justices Boomgaarden; Gray; Fenn and Jarosh (Joshua Merseal arguing obo the appellant and Stacy L. Rostad arguing obo the appellee. Natasha Martinez appeared obo the GAL but did not argue) and taken under advisement
- Opinion - Opinion and journal order, affirming with Justice Boomgaarden writing for the Court.
- Notice-Outgoing - Mandate (No record to return, DAPR record deleted)
- Notice-Outgoing - Letter enclosing mandate
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In