Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Lorain Co

Court

Lorain Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-29
Type Dissolution / Parentage
Docket 14 entries
Disposition uncontested

Parties

Plaintiff Ketcham, Jennifer J|P
Defendant Ketcham, Daniel C|N/a
Photo of Hon. Janik, Judge Frank

Judge

Hon. Janik, Judge Frank

Lorain County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Filing fee of $380.00, paid by: JENNIFER KETCHAM
  2. PETITION/WAIVER OF SUMMONS/SEPARATION AGREEMENT/PARENTING PROCEEDING AFFIDAVIT/SHARED PARENTING PLAN/AFFIDAVITS OF BASIC INFORMATION, INCOME, AND EXPENSES FOR PARTIES/AFFIDAVIT OF PROPERTY AND DEBT/HEALTH INSURANCE AFFIDAVIT FILED.
  3. CIV.R. 4.7 WAIVER OF SERVICE FORM FILED FOR PARTIES
  4. CONTACT INFORMATION FORM FILED BY PARTIES
  5. **IV-D APPLICATION NOT SUBMITTED** **SEMINAR NOTICE PROVIDED TO PARTIES**
  6. FINAL HEARING SET FOR DATE BELOW. NO NOTICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY COURT. BY SIGNING THIS ENTRY, ATTORNEY OR INDIVIDUAL FILING THIS PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY OF NOTIFYING PETITIONERS OF THE FINAL HEARING DATE SET FOR 10-7-24 AT 9 AM AND STATUS HEARING SET FOR 9-3-24 AT 9:30 AM WITH MAG BRYDA. SEE JRNL. (FJJ) CC: PLTF (MURRAY RIDGE), DEFT (MURRAY RIDGE)
  7. CLERKS OFFICE CERTIFIES COPIES OF ABOVE ENTRY DATED 7-31-24 PLACED IN ATTY FOLDER OR SENT ORDINARY MAIL TO: PLTF (MURRAY RIDGE), DEFT (MURRAY RIDGE)
  8. MATTER CAME BEFORE THE COURT FOR A STATUS HEARING ON THE PARTIES' PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION. THE PARTIES AGREED TO CONVERT TODAY INTO A FINAL UNCONTESTED HEARING. THE COURT FINDS THE TERMS ARE FAIR AND EQUITABLE TO BOTH PARTIES AND THE SHARED PARENTING PLAN IS IN THE MINOR CHILD'S BEST INTEREST. DISSOLUTION GRANTED. FINAL HEARING SET ON 10-07-24 IS HEREBY CANCELLED. COURT COSTS ASSESSED EQUALLY BETWEEN PARTIES. SEE JOURNAL. (FJJ) CC: PET-1 (OSBORNE), PET-2 (MURRAY RIDGE)
  9. HEARING HAD. DISSOLUTION GRANTED. SEE JOURNAL. (FJJ) CC: PET-1 (OSBORNE), PET-2 (MURRAY RIDGE)
  10. CIVIL RULE 58 (B) NOTICE SENT ORDINARY MAIL TO PET-1 (OSBORNE), PET-2 (MURRAY RIDGE)
  11. CLERKS OFFICE CERTIFIES COPIES OF ABOVE ENTRIES DATED 09-05-24 AND/OR RULE 58 DTD 09-06-24 PLACED IN ATTY FOLDER OR SENT ORDINARY MAIL TO: PET-1 (OSBORNE), PET-2 (MURRAY RIDGE)
  12. Receipt #: 24-0024249 Processed.
  13. CASE TAXED AND CLOSED
  14. REGULAR MAIL RETURNED TO THE CLERK OF COURTS: RULE 58 AND JRNL ENTRIES DTD 09/05/24 MAILED TO JENNIFER KETCHAM - NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED, UNABLE TO FORWARD

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more