Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-10
Status CLOSED
Type County Civil $30,001 $50,000
Docket 29 entries
Disposition final judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Stellantis Financial Services Inc
Defendant Barnett, Bryan P

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED 07/10/2024 CASE NUMBER 2024 CC 004227
  2. RIT OF EXECUTION- E-MAILED TO ATTORNEY
  3. ROPOSED WRIT OF EXECUTION
  4. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  5. RDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO COMPLETE FACT INFORMATION SHEET
  6. INAL JUDGMENT PL $44888.70 - RECORDED (OR.9206.1926. / 2024072246)
  7. ASE CLOSED
  8. INAL JUDGMENT PL $44888.70
  9. FFIDAVIT AS TO AMOUNTS DUE
  10. FFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ATTORNEYS FEES
  11. FFIDAVIT AS TO ATTORNEY'S FEES
  12. FFIDAVIT AS TO VENUE MILITARY SERVICE AND COSTS
  13. FFIDAVIT OF NON-MILITARY SERVICE
  14. EFAULT
  15. OTION FOR DEFAULT /PROPOSED DEFAULT
  16. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  17. NITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER- GENERAL
  18. LAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: LUBIN, GARY JAY ASSIGNED
  19. OTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF WITHIN FIRM AND EMAIL DESIGNATION
  20. UMMONS RETURNED SERVED
  21. UMMONS ISSUED EMAILED TO ATTY
  22. MENDED ORDER REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING EMAILED TO ATTY
  23. AYMENT $410.00 RECEIPT #2024049995
  24. LAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: WATSON, ROBERT J JR ASSIGNED
  25. IGHTEL, KRISTINA DENISE: ASSIGNED
  26. UMMONS
  27. ESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES
  28. OMPLAINT
  29. IVIL COVER SHEET

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.