Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- IVIL COVER SHEET
- LAINTIFF'S SHOWING OF GOOD CAUSE AS TO WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
- OTICE OF FILING ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT I SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
- OTICE OF FILING ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT OF ATTORNEY
- LAINTIFFS NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS
- ERTIFICATION OF PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEY
- LAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
- ACK OF PROSECUTION - COUNTY CIVIL SET FOR 10/22/2025 AT 11:00 AM IN DIV I/ , JDG: YOUNG, CHARLES P
- OTICE OF LACK OF PROSECUTION
- OTICE OF FILING RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
- OTICE OF FILING RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
- LAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
- LAINTIFF'S 2ND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
- NITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER- STREAMLINED
- LAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
- EFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO AND/OR MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
- LAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
- EFENDANT'S ATTORNEY: WESTON, MICHAEL W ASSIGNED
- EFENDANTS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF
- MAIL DESIGNATION.
- NSWER
- OTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT
- UMMONS RETURNED SERVED (AK TRUCKING)
- UMMONS RETURNED SERVED (ANTONIO)
- UMMONS ISSUED (AK TRUCKING LLC) EMAILED TO ATTY
- UMMONS ISSUED (ANTONIO) EMAILED TO ATTY
- MENDED ORDER REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING EMAILED TO ATTY
- AYMENT $420.00 RECEIPT #2024027966
- LAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: BURKETT, BRETT H ASSIGNED
- OUNG, CHARLES P: ASSIGNED
- ASE FILED 04/18/2024 CASE NUMBER 2024 CC 002346
- UMMONS
- UMMONS
- OMPLAINT
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In