Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Stamford County

Court

Stamford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-28
Type V 90 Vehicular All Other
Docket 33 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lamar Douglas|Apportionment Plaintiff Frontier Communications Of America , Inc.|Non Appearing
Defendant Frontier Communications Of America, Inc.|Apportionment Defendant Comcast Of Connecticut,inc.|Apportionment Defendant Comcast Cable Communications Management, Llc

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE Notice of Unverified Compliance
  2. OMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. PPEARANCE Appearance
  5. ETURN OF SERVICE
  6. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 9/16/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  7. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/16/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  8. EQUEST TO REVISE
  9. EVISED COMPLAINT
  10. OTICE Request for Interrogatories and Production to the Defendant
  11. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE Answer and Special Defense to Revised Complaint
  12. OTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES PB SEC 13-6(b)
  13. UMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR APPORTIONMENT AS SERVED CGS SEC 52-102b
  14. BJECTION TO MOTION OR REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY PB CH13 Objection to Defendants request for supplemental interrogatories and request for production
  15. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 1/21/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  16. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/21/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  17. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD Ext of Time to Plead to Apportionment Complaint RESULT: Granted 1/27/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  18. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/27/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  19. EQUEST TO AMEND COMPLAINT/AMENDMENT Amended Complaint
  20. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 3/3/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  21. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/3/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  22. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD To Apportionment Complaint RESULT: Granted 3/31/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  23. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/31/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  24. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE Answer and Special Defenses to plaintiff's Amended Complaint dated, January 15, 2025
  25. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 to respond to plaintiff's interrogatories and request for production RESULT: Granted 4/14/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  26. RDER RESULT: Granted 4/14/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  27. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  28. LAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  29. CHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04, V09 CASES RESULT: Order 7/8/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  30. RDER RESULT: Order 7/8/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS
  31. EPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE
  32. ERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  33. RDER RESULT: Order 7/8/2025 HON SHEILA OZALIS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more