Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fairfield County

Court

Fairfield County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-26
Type A 66 Appeals Inland Wetlands & Conservation Commission Local
Docket 35 entries
Disposition judgment by stipulation before trial commenced

Parties

Plaintiff David Arendt
Defendant Inland Wetlands And Watercourses Commission Of Trumbull
Photo of Hon. HON DALE RADCLIFFE

Judge

Hon. HON DALE RADCLIFFE

Fairfield County (CT)

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. UDGMENT BY STIPULATION BEFORE TRIAL COMMENCED RESULT: HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  2. UMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  3. ETURN OF SERVICE
  4. NSWER
  5. CHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Order 11/22/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  6. RDER RESULT: Order 11/22/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  7. ETURN OF RECORD Return of Record: Part 1 (pages 1 - 140)
  8. ETURN OF RECORD Return of Record: Part 2 (pages 141 - 353)
  9. ETURN OF RECORD Return of Record: Part 3 (pages 354 - 459)
  10. ETURN OF RECORD Return of Record: Part 4 (pages 460 - 796)
  11. ETURN OF RECORD Return of Record: Part 5 (pages 797 - 831) (Trumbull IWWC Regulations)
  12. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Caseflow Request
  13. RDER RESULT: Granted 12/11/2024 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  14. ETURN OF RECORD Return of Record: Part 6 (Transcripts)
  15. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF
  16. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/8/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  17. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Caseflow Request RESULT: Granted 1/13/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  18. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/13/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  19. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief RESULT: Granted 1/23/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  20. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/23/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  21. MENDED RETURN OF RECORD First Supplement to Return of Record
  22. RIEF Brief of Plaintiff David Arendt with Appendix
  23. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF Motion for Extension of Time for Commission's Brief and Reply Brief RESULT: Granted 2/11/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  24. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/11/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  25. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Caseflow Request RESULT: Granted 2/11/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  26. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/11/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  27. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Caseflow Request
  28. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/10/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  29. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF RESULT: Granted 3/14/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  30. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/14/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  31. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF RESULT: Granted 3/21/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  32. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/21/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  33. RDER RESULT: Order 4/10/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE
  34. OTION FOR JUDGMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION
  35. RDER RESULT: Order 4/25/2025 HON DALE RADCLIFFE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more