Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-03
Type Indebtedness
Docket 55 entries
Disposition without prejudice

Parties

Plaintiff Patel Ravina,
Defendant Patel Dipika, patel Jingneshkumar B.,
Photo of Hon. Woodward, Paul K

Judge

Hon. Woodward, Paul K

Garfield County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
  2. INDEBTEDNESS
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  4. AFFIDAVIT (AMENDED PETITION 7/29/24)
  5. LAW LIBRARY FEE
  6. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  7. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  8. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  9. SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  10. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  11. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  14. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  15. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  16. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  17. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  18. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  19. DEFENDANTS VERIFIED AFFIDAVIT
  20. SUMMONS RETURNED, SERVED: JINGNESHKUMAR PATEL PERSONALLY 6/24/24
  21. OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE WOODWARD, PAUL K TO THIS CASE.
  22. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO AC09-CARD ALLOCATION
  23. ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES REDUCED BY THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS: CJ-2024-188: AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE -$0.25 CJ-2024-188: AC88 SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURT HOUSE SECURITY -$0.25 CJ-2024-188: AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND -$0.25 CJ-2024-188: AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND -$0.63 CJ-2024-188: AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND -$0.07 CJ-2024-188: AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS -$0.02 CJ-2024-188: AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES CIVIL ONLY -$0.18 CJ-2024-188: AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND -$0.04 CJ-2024-188: AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES -$0.13 CJ-2024-188: AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND -$0.05 CJ-2024-188: AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL -$0.15 CJ-2024-188: AC01 CLERK FEES -$4.04
  24. RECEIPT # 2024-569274 ON 07/03/2024. PAYOR: ROBERTS/MICHAEL D TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 242.14. LINE ITEMS: CJ-2024-188: $158.96 ON AC01 CLERK FEES. CJ-2024-188: $6.06 ON AC09 CARD ALLOCATIONS. CJ-2024-188: $5.85 ON AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL. CJ-2024-188: $1.61 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND. CJ-2024-188: $4.87 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES. CJ-2024-188: $1.51 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND. CJ-2024-188: $6.82 ON AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES CIVIL ONLY. CJ-2024-188: $0.43 ON AC65 STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND, INTERPRETER SVCS. CJ-2024-188: $2.41 ON AC67 DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND. CJ-2024-188: $24.37 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND. CJ-2024-188: $9.75 ON AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND. CJ-2024-188: $9.75 ON AC88 SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURT HOUSE SECURITY. CJ-2024-188: $9.75 ON AC89 COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE.
  25. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE BY STEPHEN JONES & WILLIAM JEWEL
  26. AMENDED PETITION (ORIGINALLY FILED 7/3/24)
  27. JUDGE NEWBY FOR WOODWARD - BENCH DOCKET - PLTF APPEARS BY JONES & JEWELL ATTYS AND REQUEST EMERGENCY EJECTMENT - STANDARD NOT MET & THEREFORE DENIED
  28. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUCTION AND APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  29. MOTION TO SET HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  30. MOTION TO STRIKE FIRST AMENDED PETITION AND MOTION TO DISMISS CASE
  31. RENEWED APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  32. SUMMONS ISSUED - SHERIFF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  33. JUDGE WOODWARD-BENCH DKT: PLTF/JONES AND JEWELL; RENEW REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY TEMP. REGISTRY ORDER BASED ON NEW EVIDENCE - GRANTED - DEFT'S TO MOVE FROM SUPER 8 BY 9-6-2024 @ 12 NOON. SHOWCAUSE 9-13-2024 @ 2:00PM
  34. RECEIPT # 2024-572917 ON 09/05/2024. PAYOR: STEPHEN JONES & ASSOCIATES TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $ 50.00. LINE ITEMS: CJ-2024-188: $50.00 ON AC08 SHERIFF FEES.
  35. MOTION TO DISSOLVE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER ISSUED WITHOUT NOTICE
  36. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, TEMPORARY RESTAINING ORDER, AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUCTION
  37. NOTICE OF HEARING
  38. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISSOLVE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER ISSUED WITHOUT NOTICE
  39. JUDGE WOODWARD-BENCH DKT: PLTF/JONES AND JEWELL; DEFT/ROBERTS; STATUS OCT 8 2024 @ 9:00AM - TRO REMAINS IN EFFECT, HOWEVER DEFT HAVE NOT WAIVED ANY OF THEIR RIGHTS
  40. JUDGE WOODWARD-MOTION DKT: PLTF/JEWELL; DEFT/ROBERTS; MOTION TO DISMISS TO BE SET FOR HEARING
  41. NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION
  42. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE FIRST AMENDED PETITION AND MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED PETITION, AND NOTICE OF SUMMONS
  43. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE FIRST AMENDED PETITION AND MOTION TO DISMISS
  44. JUDGE WOODWARD-BENCH DKT: PLTF/JEWELL; DEFT/ROBERTS; RESPONSE STRICKEN AS OUT OF TIME, MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  45. JUDGE WOODWARD: DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  46. JUDGE WOODWARD: DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  47. ORDER
  48. MOTION FOR DAMAGES FEES RELATED TO ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  49. RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFFS TO MOTION FOR DAMAGES FEES RELATED TO ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY FOR RESTRAINING ORDER REQUEST FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR 15 DAYS
  50. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR DAMAGES FEES RELATED TO ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
  51. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
  52. ORDER ALLOWING WITHDRAWL BY COUNSEL
  53. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE-SHERRY WALLACE DEBORD FOR KIPIKA J. PATEL AND JIGNESHKUMAR B. PATEL
  54. NOTICE OF ATTORNEY'S LIEN
  55. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE- SHERRY WALLACE DEBORD FOR DIPIKA J PATEL AND JIGNESHKUMAR B PATEL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more