Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Pinellas County

Court

Pinellas County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-25
Status OPEN
Type Condominium Circuit
Docket 60 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Tara Mcnulty
Defendant Eastwood Shores Condo No 3 Association Inc
Photo of Hon. Hamilton Rebecca

Judge

Hon. Hamilton Rebecca

Pinellas County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. IVIL COVER SHEET - E-FILED Amount: 75001.00
  2. OTICE OF HEARING
  3. RDER GRANTING
  4. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  5. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  6. ISCLOSURE
  7. ITNESS LIST
  8. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  9. OTICE OF HEARING
  10. OTION Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  11. OTION Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  12. ERTIFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION
  13. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  14. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  15. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  16. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  17. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  18. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  19. NSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  20. GREED ORDER
  21. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  22. OTION TO AMEND Party: MCNULTY, TARA
  23. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  24. OTICE OF FILING
  25. OTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY
  26. ERTIFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION
  27. EQUEST FOR COPIES
  28. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  29. RDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
  30. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  31. OTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  32. RDER GRANTING
  33. ORRESPONDENCE TO COURT RE
  34. OTICE OF WITHDRAWAL
  35. EQUEST
  36. EQUEST FOR
  37. OTION TO STRIKE Party: MCNULTY, TARA
  38. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  39. OTICE OF SERVICE ANSWERS INTERROGATORIES
  40. OTION Party: MCNULTY, TARA
  41. RDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
  42. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  43. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  44. OTICE OF FILING
  45. NSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  46. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  47. RDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
  48. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  49. ETURNED FROM POST OFFICE
  50. RDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
  51. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  52. ESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESS(ES) Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  53. OTICE OF APPEARANCE Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  54. ASE MANAGEMENT STATUS ORDER
  55. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  56. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  57. OTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES
  58. OTICE OF SERVICE OF
  59. UMMONS - ISSUED Party: EASTWOOD SHORES CONDO NO 3 ASSOCIATION INC,
  60. OMPLAINT WITH DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more