Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-16
Status Pending
Type Cm Criminal Misdemeanor
Docket 38 entries

Parties

Plaintiff State Of Indiana
Defendant Ridley, Monica
Photo of Hon. Lett Thomas R

Judge

Hon. Lett Thomas R

Grant County (IN)

Indiana

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Case Opened as a New Filing
  2. Case Filed Electronically
  3. Notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information
  4. Information Filed
  5. Probable Cause Affidavit Filed
  6. Appearance Filed
  7. Notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information
  8. Probable Cause Found: Order Issued
  9. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  10. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  11. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  12. Service Issued
  13. Motion for Continuance Filed
  14. Order Denying Motion for Continuance
  15. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  16. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  17. Service Issued
  18. Motion for Continuance Filed
  19. Order Granting Motion for Continuance
  20. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  21. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  22. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  23. Service Issued
  24. Initial Hearing
  25. Written Advisement and Waiver of Rights Filed
  26. Order on Initial Hearing
  27. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  28. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  29. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  30. Service Issued
  31. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  32. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  33. Service Issued
  34. Service Issued
  35. Motion for Continuance Filed
  36. Order Granting Motion for Continuance
  37. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  38. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.