Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-04
Type Cc Suit On Account
Docket 37 entries
Disposition dismissed

Parties

Plaintiff 370/missouri Bottom Road/taussig Road Cid|Jones, Robert E|370/missouri Bottom Road/taussig Road Tdd
Defendant Wwadd, Llc
Photo of Hon. Mclaughlin, Nancy Watkins

Judge

Hon. Mclaughlin, Nancy Watkins

St. Louis County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Judge/Clerk - Note NO TAX
  3. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  4. Order of Dismissal COMES NOW PLAINTIFFS AND HEREBY DISMISSES COUNT I OF THEIR CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT WITH PREJUDICE, AT PLAINTIFFS' COST. PLAINTIFF DIMISSES COUNT II OF THEIR CAUSE OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AT PLAINTIFFS' COST. SO ORDERED: JUDGE NANCY M. WATKINS MCLAUGHLIN
  5. Dismissed by Parties
  6. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  7. Voluntary Dismissal Filed Voluntary Dismissal; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ROBERT E JONES On Behalf Of: 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD CID, 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD TDD
  8. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  9. Answer Filed WWADD Answer; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT FRANCIS WALTERBACH On Behalf Of: WWADD, LLC
  10. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  11. Order Granting Ext of Time ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITION SO ORDERED: JUDGE NANCY M. WATKINS MCLAUGHLIN
  12. Order Granting Ext of Time MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITION IS GRANTED. SO ORDERED: JUDGE NANCY M. WATKINS MCLAUGHLIN Associated Entries: 09/27/2022 - Motion for Extension of Time +
  13. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  14. Proposed Order Filed Proposed Order Granting Defendants Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT FRANCIS WALTERBACH On Behalf Of: 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD CID, 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD TDD
  15. Motion for Extension of Time Consent Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Petition; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT FRANCIS WALTERBACH Associated Entries: 10/05/2022 - Order Granting Ext of Time +
  16. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  17. Order Granting Ext of Time CONSENT MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITION IS GRANTED BY COURT. SO ORDERED: JUDGE NANCY M. WATKINS MCLAUGHLIN
  18. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  19. Proposed Order Filed Order Granting Stipulated Extension of Time to Respond to Petition; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT FRANCIS WALTERBACH On Behalf Of: 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD CID, 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD TDD
  20. Motion for Extension of Time Consent Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Petition; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT FRANCIS WALTERBACH
  21. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  22. Order Granting Ext of Time THE COURT ENTERED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITION. SO ORDERED: JUDGE NANCY M. WATKINS MCLAUGHLIN
  23. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  24. Proposed Order Filed Order Granting Defendants Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Petition; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT FRANCIS WALTERBACH On Behalf Of: 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD CID, 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD TDD
  25. Motion for Extension of Time Consent Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Petition; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT FRANCIS WALTERBACH
  26. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  27. Order Granting Ext of Time SO ORDERED: JUDGE NANCY M. WATKINS MCLAUGHLIN
  28. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  29. Proposed Order Filed Filed By: SCOTT FRANCIS WALTERBACH On Behalf Of: 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD CID, 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD TDD
  30. Motion for Extension of Time Consent Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Petition; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SCOTT FRANCIS WALTERBACH
  31. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  32. Agent Served Document ID - 22-SMCC-4102; Served To - WWADD, LLC; Server - ; Served Date - 23-MAY-22; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  33. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  34. Summons Issued-Circuit Document ID: 22-SMCC-4102, for WWADD, LLC. Summons Attached in PDF Form for Attorney to Retrieve from Secure Case.Net and Process for Service.
  35. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  36. Filing Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: ROBERT E JONES
  37. Pet Filed in Circuit Ct Petition; Exhibit 1; Exhibit 2. Filed By: ROBERT E JONES On Behalf Of: 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD CID, 370/MISSOURI BOTTOM ROAD/TAUSSIG ROAD TDD

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more