Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, SERVICE REQUEST
- UDGMENT ENTRY(56143068) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: DANIEL TIMOTHY HANSON 12016 REVERE AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44105
- UDGMENT ENTRY(56143067) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: ANTHONY S CALIGUIRE [email protected]
- UDGMENT ENTRY(56143066) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SHAWN P MCCLURE [email protected]
- OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED, FILED 01/15/2025, IS GRANTED. THE UNOPPOSED MOTION DEMONSTRATES THAT THERE IS NO GENUINE OF MATERIAL FACT AND UPON THE UNDISPUTED FACTS, MOVANT IS ENTITLED UNDER THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF CIV R 56(C) TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW. JUDGMENT ENTERED OIN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DANIEL TIMOTHY HANSON IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,957.13 UPON WHICH INTEREST WILL ACCRUE AT THE CONTRACTUAL RATE UNTIL PAID IN FULL. COSTS TO DEFENDANT. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
- OTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED
- NSCHEDULED EVENT HELD ON 09/12/2024. DEFENDANT FILED AN ANSWER 09/10/2024. THE LITIGATION SCHEDULE WILL BE AS FOLLOWS: ALL DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 12/06/2024. DISPOSITIVE MOTION TO BE FILED BY 01/17/2025. RESPONSE/REPLY DUE PER OHIO R. CIV. P. 6(C). THE COURT WILL RULE ON ANY PENDING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS NO LESS THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TRIAL DATE. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 04/10/2025 AT 10:00 AM. ALL PARTIES AND CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVES MUST BE PRESENT WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY. IF THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST IS AN INSURANCE COMPANY, CORPORATION, COMMON CARRIER, OR OTHER ENTITY, THEN THE CHOSEN REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE THE PERSON WITH FULL, FINAL, AND IMMEDIATE AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER INTO A BINDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO ALL CLAIMS. A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY SHALL SEND A REPRESENTATIVE AUTHORIZED TO ACT ON ITS BEHALF. PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS. THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER DIRECTED TO SUBMIT PRETRIAL STATEMENTS AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE FINAL PRETRIAL. THE PRETRIAL STATEMENTS SHALL SET FORTH THE FOLLOWING: (1) STATEMENT OF FACTS AND LEGAL ISSUES; (2) STATEMENT OF REAL FACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN DISPUTE; (3) STIPULATIONS; (4) LIST OF NON-EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH A BRIEF SUMMARY OF EXPECTED TESTIMONY; (5) LIST OF EXPERT TRIAL WITNESSES WITH REPORTS ATTACHED; (6) SPECIAL LEGAL PROBLEMS ANTICIPATED; (8) PRETRIAL MOTIONS CONTEMPLATED; (9) LATEST DEMAND/OFFER. ON SOME OCCASIONS THE COURT'S SCHEDULE MAY PREVENT THE JUDGE FROM CONDUCTING THE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IN PERSON. IF THE ATTORNEYS BELIEVE IT IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY THAT THE JUDGE CONDUCT THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN PERSON, THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO CONTACT THE JUDICIAL STAFF ATTORNEY AT LEAST SEVENTY-TWO (72) HOURS IN ADVANCE TO MAKE SUCH A REQUEST. IN ANY INSTANCE WHERE THE JUDGE HAS A CONFLICT, THE COURT WILL RESET THE FINAL PRETRIAL IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE JUDGE TO PRESIDE IN PERSON. BENCH TRIAL SET FOR 05/20/2025 AT 09:00 AM. ANY MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE SHALL BE MADE IN WRITING AND CAPTIONED "MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE." IF ALL PARTIES OR CERTAIN PARTIES AGREE TO THE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE, SUCH AGREEMENT SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE CAPTION. THE COURT WILL NOT RULE ON AMBIGUOUSLY TITLED MOTIONS WHICH ARE, IN EFFECT, MOTIONS FOR A CONTINUANCE (E.G., A MOTION TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE). ANY MOTION FILED WHICH DOES NOT FULFILL THE CRITERIA ABOVE WILL BE SUMMARILY DENIED OR STRICKEN. NOTICE ISSUED
- 1 DANIEL TIMOTHY HANSON DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. PRO SE 9999999
- UYAHOGA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT SERVICE FEE $56.00
- ON 08/19/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED HANSON/DANIEL/TIMOTHY BY LEAVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON.
- UMS COMPLAINT(54506387) SENT BY CUYAHOGA SHERIFF SERVICE. TO: DANIEL TIMOTHY HANSON 12016 REVERE AVE CLEVELAND, OH 44105
- HERIFF SERVICE PACKET
- UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
- RIT FEE
- UDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
- EGAL RESEARCH
- EGAL NEWS
- EGAL AID
- OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
- OMPUTER FEE
- LERK'S FEE
- EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID SHAWN P MCCLURE
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In