Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Meriden County

Court

Meriden County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-19
Type V 90 Vehicular All Other
Docket 23 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Mark Mooney
Defendant Barbara Ruddy

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. ETURN OF SERVICE
  5. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Re: Petty Details & Police Officer
  6. OTICE of Service of Discovery
  7. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 10/21/2024 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  8. RDER RESULT: Granted 10/21/2024 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  9. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 11/14/2024 BY THE CLERK
  10. RDER RESULT: Granted 11/14/2024 BY THE CLERK
  11. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE To Defendants standard I & P's
  12. ERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  13. NSWER
  14. LAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  15. FFER OF COMPROMISE
  16. BJECTION Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Claim for Jury of 6 #108.00 RESULT: Order 3/24/2025 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  17. RDER RESULT: Order 3/24/2025 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  18. RIEF Plaintiff's Position Statement for Remote Hearing In Damages
  19. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE of Hearing In Damages RESULT: Granted 4/24/2025 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  20. RDER order granting motion for continuance RESULT: Granted 4/24/2025 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  21. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE of Hearing In Damages RESULT: Granted 5/27/2025 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  22. RDER order granting motion for continuance RESULT: Granted 5/27/2025 HON STEVEN JACOBS
  23. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more