Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Napa County Superior

Court

Napa County Superior

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-08
Status Dismissed
Type Conservatorship: Estate Only
Docket 92 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Lofing, Scott
Photo of Hon. Smith, Cynthia P

Judge

Hon. Smith, Cynthia P

Napa County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. 08/08/2024 Notice of Hearing
  2. 08/08/2024 Petition: Appointment Conservator
  3. 08/08/2024 Confidential Supplemental Information GC-312
  4. 08/08/2024 Petition or Opposition: Subsequent Comment IN THE MATTER OF THE DAVID R. AND CLAUDIA LOFING FAMILY TRUST 2009
  5. Comment IN THE MATTER OF THE DAVID R. AND CLAUDIA LOFING FAMILY TRUST 2009
  6. Notice of Hearing
  7. Comment PETITION FOR INSTRUCTIONS
  8. Petition or Opposition: Subsequent
  9. Comment FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, UNDUE INFLUENCE, AND CONSTRUCTIVE FRUAD AGAINST A FIDUCIARY
  10. Notice of Hearing
  11. Comment FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, UNDUE INFLUENCE, AND CONSTRUCTIVE FRUAD AGAINST A FIDUCIARY
  12. Declaration
  13. Comment PETITIONER, SCOTT LOFING'S SWORN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF HIS PETITION FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, UNDUE INFLUENCE, AND CONSTRUTIVE FRAUD
  14. Proof of Service
  15. Proof of Service
  16. Comment AS TO COOMBS AND DUNLAP
  17. Report: Investigator-Conservatorship PERSON-Perm
  18. Proof of Service
  19. Proof of Service
  20. Comment AS TO JENNIFER BYRAM
  21. Opposition or Objections
  22. Comment OBJECTIONS TO SCOTT LOFING'S PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CLAUDIA LOFING
  23. Opposition or Objections
  24. Comment OBJECTIONS TO PETITION FOR INSTRUCTIONS IN THE MATTER OF THE DAVID R. AND CLAUDIA LOFING FAMILY TRUST 2009 AND TO PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, UNDUE INFLUENCE, AND CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD AGAINST A FIDUCIARY; AND REQUEST FOR CONFIRMATION OF CURRENT TRUSTEES
  25. Establish Conservatorship/Guardianship
  26. Original Type Establish Conservatorship/Guardianship
  27. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  28. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  29. Result Heard
  30. Petition Hearing
  31. Original Type Petition Hearing
  32. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  33. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  34. Result Heard
  35. Comment PETITION FOR INSTRUCTIONS
  36. Petition Hearing
  37. Original Type Petition Hearing
  38. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  39. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  40. Result Heard
  41. Comment FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, UNDUE INFLUENCE, AND CONSTRUCTIVE FRUAD AGAINST A FIDUCIARY
  42. Minute Order
  43. Declaration
  44. Comment DECLARATION OF SCOTT LOFING
  45. Establish Conservatorship/Guardianship
  46. Original Type Establish Conservatorship/Guardianship
  47. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  48. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  49. Result Heard
  50. Petition Hearing
  51. Original Type Petition Hearing
  52. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  53. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  54. Result Heard
  55. Comment PETITION FOR INSTRUCTIONS
  56. Petition Hearing
  57. Original Type Petition Hearing
  58. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  59. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  60. Result Heard
  61. Comment FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, UNDUE INFLUENCE, AND CONSTRUCTIVE FRUAD AGAINST A FIDUCIARY
  62. Minute Order
  63. Petition Hearing
  64. Original Type Petition Hearing
  65. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  66. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  67. Result Heard
  68. Comment to set - FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY, UNDUE INFLUENCE, AND CONSTRUCTIVE FRUAD AGAINST A FIDUCIARY.
  69. Petition Hearing
  70. Original Type Petition Hearing
  71. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  72. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  73. Result Heard
  74. Comment to set - PETITION FOR INSTRUCTIONS
  75. Notice of Hearing Court
  76. Comment Notice of December 19, 2024 hearing and the January 10, 2025 hearing.
  77. Minute Order
  78. Notice of Hearing
  79. Proof of Service
  80. Proof of Service
  81. Conference: Mandatory Settlement
  82. Original Type Conference: Mandatory Settlement
  83. Judicial Officer Guadagni, Raymond A.
  84. Hearing Time 1:00 PM
  85. Result MSC Held - Case Settled
  86. MSC Outcome
  87. Request: Dismissal
  88. Stat Closure: PR Dismissal - Request for Dismissal
  89. Petition Hearing
  90. Judicial Officer Smith, Cynthia P
  91. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  92. Cancel Reason Vacated

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more