Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-24
Type Slander
Docket 70 entries
Disposition dismiss
Photo of Hon. Estes Burl

Judge

Hon. Estes Burl

Osage County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION
  2. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND FEE
  3. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  4. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  5. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  6. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  7. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  8. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  9. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  10. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  11. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  12. SUMMONS ISSUED BACK TO ATTY FOR SERVICE ON SEAN ROBERTS
  13. SUMMONS RETURNED SERVING SEAN ROBERTS BY EMAIL TO E
  14. SCOTT LOFTIS ON 8-24-22
  15. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND RESERVATION OF TIME
  16. DEFT ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO PLAINTIFF'S PETITION
  17. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  18. MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMS
  19. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  20. COUNTERCLAIMS
  21. PLAINTIFFS'REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
  22. DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMS
  23. CM; BOE; ATTY FOR PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT PRESENT; THE
  24. ATTORNEYS FOR BOTH PARTIES CALLED THE COURT REQUESTING
  25. A HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. THE COURT
  26. SET SAID MOTION FOR HEARING ON FEBRRUARY 23, 2023 AT
  27. 10:00AM IN ROOM 203
  28. CT MINUTE
  29. ORDER AND NOTICE SETTING HEARING
  30. COURT REPORTER FEE
  31. CM, BOE, PLAINT APPEARING W/ATTY TAYLOR A BURKE, DEFT
  32. W/ATTY C SCOTT LOFTIS; THIS MATTER COMES ON FOR HEARING
  33. THE MOTION TO DISMISS. COUNSELS PRESENT FOR EACH PARTY
  34. MAKES ARGUMENT. CT EXAMINES MOTIONS AND BRIEFS
  35. SUBMITTED AND ORDERS COUNSEL FOR D AMEND TO CONFORM TO
  36. REQUIREMENTS THE COUNTERCLAIM TO BE SUBMITTED AND
  37. MATTER RESET FOR STATUS 5-9-23 @ 9:30AM
  38. CT MINUTE
  39. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND NOTICE
  40. SETTING HEARING
  41. DEFENDANT'S AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO
  42. PLAINTIFF'S PETITION
  43. MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
  44. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  45. AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
  46. PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
  47. DEFENDANT'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
  48. CM; BOE; PLAINT W/COUNSEL TAYLOR BURKE, DEFT W/COUNSEL
  49. C SCOTT LOFTIS, THIS MATTER COMES ON FOR STATUS, AND
  50. ARGUMENT ON P'S MTN TO DISMISS AMENDED ANSWER AND
  51. COUNTERCLAIM. CT HEARS ARGUMENTS OF COUNSEL AND
  52. SUSTAINS P'S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS THE RIW CLAIM OF
  53. D, COURT ENTERS THIS ORDER PER 12OS §994 AND RESERVES
  54. ALL OTHER ISSUES REMAINING. COURT ORDERS PARTIES TO
  55. MEDIATION AND CIRCULATE A SCHEDULING ORDER
  56. CT MINUTE
  57. NOTICE OF FILING ORIGINAL TRANSCRIPT
  58. NOTICE OF FILING ORIGINAL TRANSCRIPT
  59. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT'S AMENDED CONTERCLAIMS,
  60. SCHEDULING ORDER
  61. CERTIFICATE OF APPEAL-SD-121445
  62. PETITION IN ERROR
  63. CM, BOE, COMES BEFORE THE COURT UPON THE COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY W/ REGARD TO MEDIATION. PARTIES HAVE ISSUE W/ WHOM THEY WISH TO HAVE MEDIATE. P'S CO ARGUES THAT DUE TO THE COMPLEXITIES OF THE ISSUES, MEDIATION SHOULD BE DONE BY AN ATTORNEY AND D ARGUES EARLY SETTLEMENT SHOULD BE UTILIZED. AFTER HEARING ARGUMENT, CT ORDERS PRIVATE MEDIATOR TO BE UTILIZED AND EACH PAY 1/2 OF THE COSTS. CT WILL REVIEW THE COST UPON COMPLETION OF THE CASE.
  64. CT MINUTE
  65. RESPONSE TO PETITION IN ERROR
  66. NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS
  67. AGREED MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
  68. MANDATE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.