Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- Citation Requested By ENTZMINGER, WILL, NICHOLS, EVAN Served 08/15/20244:40 PM Actual Server Private Process Server Returned 08/16/2024 11:09 AM
- Original Petition (OCA)
- Service Returned Served - by Private Process Server
- DEFENDANT'S ORIGINAL ANSWER
- Judge's Docket Note Comment Signed OSH- BH
- ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE Judicial Officer Hendricks, Brooke
- MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
- DEFENDANT REQUESTS ALL FUTURE NOTICES TO BE EMAILED
- Judge's Docket Note Comment Granted MTC. BH
- ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE Judicial Officer Hendricks, Brooke Comment GRANTED
- Bench Trial Judicial Officer(s) Bobo, J. A. (Jim), Bobo, J. A. (Jim) Hearing Time 09:30 AM Cancel Reason Continued
- Judge's Docket Note Comment Signed FIRST AMENDED ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE- BH
- ORDER SETTING HEARING Judicial Officer Hendricks, Brooke Comment FIRST AMENDED SET FOR: AT 9:00 AM
- MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
- Judge's Docket Note Comment Denied MTC- BH
- Order of Deny Judicial Officer Hendricks, Brooke Comment ORDER ON MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
- Bench Trial Judicial Officer(s) Bobo, J. A. (Jim), Bobo, J. A. (Jim) Hearing Time 09:00 AM
- Judge's Docket Note Comment Mr. Keller was present for Plaintiff, Mr. Stacy Nichols was present pro se. Found on behalf of the Plaintiff, ordered immediate possession of the EZ hauler and ordered defendant to pay court costs, but no exemplary damages. BH
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In