Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- Event - Docketed and indexed
- Notice-Incoming - Record completion notice from district court
- otice-Outgoing - Docketing letter (E-Served via CTEF)
- ecord sent to SC in error, should have been sent to PD. One volume was not bates numbered and was returned to DC attn to Deb. DCC will contact PD's office to pick up rest of the record and let them know one volume has to be numbered before it is mailed to their office.
- rief - Anders
- otion - Extension of time - other
- otion - Withdrawal of counsel
- ecord - Received unfiled record from the Office of the State Public Defender, seven volumes containing original papers, confidential pleadings, and eleven transcripts.
- vent - Hardcopy received - Brief of Appellant Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief; and Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
- rder Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief
- otion - Other (Substitute Counsel)
- vent - Hardcopy received - Motion for Substitution of Counsel
- rder Allowing Substitution of Counsel (Ryan Roden is withdrawn as counsel, and Brandon Booth is substituted as counsel for Appellant)
- rief - Appellant pro se after Anders
- vent - Phone Call to AG's office, with Melissa, advising them that a pro se brief after Anders was filed.
- pinion - Published Order Affirming the District Court's Order Denying Motion for New Trial Based on Newly Discovered Evidence
- otice-Outgoing - Mandate
- ecord - Unfiled record returned to district court
- otice-Outgoing - Record return letter (unfiled)
- vent - Case closed
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In