Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-17
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 25 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant Michael J. Fusik
Photo of Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Judge

Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. CASE REFUND TO CARLILE, PATCHEN & MURPHY
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55723860) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MICHAEL J. FUSIK 11708 ERWIN AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44135
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55723859) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(55723858) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
  6. STATUS CONFERENCE HELD ON 12/19/2024. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL; DEFENDANT MICHAEL J. FUSIK FAILED TO APPEAR AND IS IN DEFAULT. AT THE LAST COURT DATE, THIS COURT PERMITTED DEFENDANT FUSIK ADDITIONAL TIME UNTIL AND INCLUDING 12/13/2024 TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; HOWEVER, DEFENDANT FAILED TO FILE HIS REPLY. PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 56(C), THE COURT, HAVING CONSIDERED ALL OF THE EVIDENCE AND HAVING CONSTRUED THE EVIDENCE IN A LIGHT MOST FAVORABLE TO THE NON-MOVING PARTY, DETERMINES THAT REASONABLE MINDS CAN COME BUT TO ONE CONCLUSION, THAT THERE ARE NO GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT AND THAT UNIVERSITY OF AKRON IS ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW. OHIO R. CIV. P. 56(E) REQUIRES THAT A PARTY ADVERSE TO A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT "...MAY NOT REST UPON THE MERE ALLEGATIONS OR DENIALS OF THE PARTY'S PLEADINGS, BUT THE PARTY'S RESPONSE, BY AFFIDAVIT OR AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS RULE, MUST SET FORTH SPECIFIC FACTS SHOWING THAT THERE IS A GENUINE ISSUE FOR TRIAL. IF THE PARTY DOES NOT SO RESPOND, SUMMARY JUDGMENT, IF APPROPRIATE, SHALL BE ENTERED AGAINST THE PARTY." DEFENDANT TYRAN WALKER HAS NOT OFFERED ANY SPECIFIC FACTS TO CONTRADICT PLAINTIFF'S EVIDENCED CLAIMS AS REQUIRED BY CIV.R. 56(E); DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS COMPRISED ONLY OF NON-SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS AND DENIALS. DEFENDANT HAS NOT FILED A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND HAS THEREFORE CHOSEN TO LEAVE IT UNOPPOSED. DEFENDANT HAS THEREFORE LEFT THE COURT WITH NO JUST COURSE OTHER THAN TO GRANT SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PLAINTIFF'S FAVOR. ACCORDINGLY, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FILED 09/26/2024, IS UNOPPOSED AND GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS TO BE RENDERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST THE DEFENDANT MICHAEL J. FUSIK IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,901.56, PLUS INTEREST AT THE STATUTORY RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM FROM DECEMBER 3, 2023, PLUS COSTS OF THIS ACTION. FINAL. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. CMC BY PHONE HELD ON 11/13/2024. PLAINTIFF APPEARED THROUGH COUNSEL; DEFENDANT MICHAEL FUSIK APPEARED PRO SE. DEFENDANT FUSIK WAS REFERRED TO THE COURT RESOURCE CENTER. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FILED 09/26/2024, IS GRANTED AS OF 11/13/2024. DEFENDANT FUSIK HAS UNTIL 12/13/2024 TO FILE A REPLY. ALL PARTIES AGREED TO THE FOLLOWING CASE SCHEDULE: STATUS CONFERENCE SET FOR 12/19/2024 AT 02:30 PM. ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL THE CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 1-720-708-1090 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 7235579# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF SHALL INFORM ALL PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. 02/11/2025: DISCOVERY CUT-OFF IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. NOTICE FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ATTORNEY RYAN S. BUNDY 0090027 NOTICE OF FILING - LETTER TO DEFENDANT RE CMC
  9. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 11/13/2024 AT 02:00 PM ALL ATTORNEYS AND PRO SE PARTIES ARE TO CALL CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 720-708-1090 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 7235579# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE, TIME, AND CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER AND ACCESS CODE. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT ON THE CONFERENCE CALL AND FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE BE PRESENT ON THE CONFERENCE CALL. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO APPEAR AT THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. DISCOVERY IS TO START IMMEDIATELY. PARTIES TO BE READY WITH DEMAND AND OFFER OF SETTLEMENT. NOTICE ISSUED. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. NOTICE FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ATTORNEY RYAN S. BUNDY 0090027 NOTICE OF ADMISSIONS
  11. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED
  12. MOTION FILED FOR P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION RYAN S. BUNDY 0090027 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  13. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54341674 DELIVERED BY USPS 07/24/2024 FUSIK/MICHAEL/J. PROCESSED BY COC 07/31/2024.
  14. D1 MICHAEL J. FUSIK ANSWER & DEFENSES OF DEFENDANT. PRO SE 9999999
  15. SUMS COMPLAINT(54341674) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MICHAEL J. FUSIK 11708 ERWIN AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44135
  16. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. WRIT FEE
  18. JUDGE SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  19. LEGAL RESEARCH
  20. LEGAL NEWS
  21. LEGAL AID
  22. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  23. COMPUTER FEE
  24. CLERK'S FEE
  25. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID RYAN S. BUNDY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more