Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-29
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 97 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Fifth Third Bank, N.a. Madisonville Operations Center
Defendant Lauren J. Lund|John C. Lund|The United States Of America, The Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development|State Of Ohio, Department Of Taxation|City Of Berea, Ohio Attention: Legal Department
Photo of Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Judge

Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54894224) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CITY OF BEREA, OHIO 11 BEREA COMMONS BEREA, OH 44017
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54894223) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54894222) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JOHN C. LUND 363 BALDWIN DRIVE BEREA, OH 44017
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54894221) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: LAUREN J. LUND [email protected]
  6. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54894220) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54894219) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54894218) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: NICOLE R. RANDALL [email protected]
  9. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT PLAINTIFF'S COSTS. FINAL COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54424432 RETURNED 08/23/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT LUND/LAUREN/J. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  11. POST JUDGMENT MOTION $30 JUSTIN M. RITCH (0085358) MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE TO THE ACTIVE DOCKET 09/30/2024 - GRANTED
  12. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  13. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS UNDER RULE 41(A)(2) 09/24/2024 - GRANTED
  14. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54759255) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: CITY OF BEREA, OHIO 11 BEREA COMMONS BEREA, OH 44017
  15. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54759254) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  16. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54759253) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: JOHN C. LUND 363 BALDWIN DRIVE BEREA, OH 44017
  17. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54447204 RETURNED 08/23/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT LUND/LAUREN/J. - NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  18. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54759252) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: LAUREN J. LUND [email protected]
  19. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54759251) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  20. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54759250) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JUSTIN M. RITCH [email protected]
  21. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54759249) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: NICOLE R. RANDALL [email protected]
  22. CMC HELD. ONLY COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF APPEARED. MAGISTRATE WAS INFORMED OF PENDING LOSS MITIGATION. THE COURT WILL RULE ON THE PENDING MOTION TO STAY SHORTLY. NOTICE ISSUED
  23. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY IS GRANTED. THIS MATTER MAY ONLY BE REACTIVATED UPON WRITTEN MOTION. FURTHER, PLAINTIFF IS ORDER TO FILE A STATUS UPDATE REGARDING LOSS MITIGATION ON DECEMBER 20, 2024. THIS REQUIREMENT IS VACATED SHOULD PLAINTIFF MOVE TO REACTIVATE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  24. MOTION FILED FOR P1 FIFTH THIRD BANK, N.A. JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 MOTION TO STAY CASE 09/09/2024 - GRANTED
  25. ANSWER FILED BY D4 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION ATTORNEY NICOLE R. RANDALL 0081351 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
  26. NOTICE FILED BY P1 FIFTH THIRD BANK, N.A. ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 NOTICE OF HEARING
  27. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54447205 RETURNED 8/23/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT LUND/JOHN/C. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  28. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54447204 RETURNED 8/23/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT LUND/LAUREN/J. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  29. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54424433 RETURNED 8/23/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT LUND/JOHN/C. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  30. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 54424432 RETURNED 8/23/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT LUND/LAUREN/J. - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  31. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 09/09/2024 AT 09:30 AM BY TELEPHONE. THE CASE IS SET FOR TELEPHONE CMC. ANY PARTY MAY APPEAR AT THE TELEPHONE CMC BY CALLING 216-443-8505 TEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE CMC. PLAINTIFF MUST SEND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF THE CMC AT LEAST 14 DAYS PRIOR TO THE CMC. THIS NOTICE MUST PROVIDE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION ABOVE NOTICE ISSUED
  32. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54447208 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/15/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 08/21/2024.
  33. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54424435 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/12/2024 STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION PROCESSED BY COC 08/21/2024.
  34. ANSWER FILED.
  35. GENERAL PLEADING FILED BY P1 FIFTH THIRD BANK, N.A. ATTORNEY JUSTIN M. RITCH 0085358 CIVIL RULE 26(B)(3) INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  36. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54447209 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/06/2024 CITY OF BEREA, OHIO PROCESSED BY COC 08/14/2024.
  37. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54447207 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/07/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN PROCESSED BY COC 08/14/2024.
  38. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54447206 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/06/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN PROCESSED BY COC 08/14/2024.
  39. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54424436 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/05/2024 CITY OF BEREA, OHIO PROCESSED BY COC 08/14/2024.
  40. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54424434 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/02/2024 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN PROCESSED BY COC 08/07/2024.
  41. 54449084 ON 08/02/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED LUND/JOHN/C. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  42. 54449083 ON 08/02/2024 I SERVED THE WITHIN NAMED LUND/LAUREN/J. BY SERVING A TRUE AND CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH ALL THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON. S.P.S.
  43. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED JOHN SERVICE RETURN
  44. NOTICE OF SUMMONS SERVICE RETURN FILED LAUREN SERVICE RETURN
  45. SUMS COMPLAINT(54447209) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CITY OF BEREA, OHIO 11 BEREA COMMONS BEREA, OH 44017
  46. SUMS COMPLAINT(54447208) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION 150 EAST GAY STREET 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  47. SUMS COMPLAINT(54447207) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20530-0000
  48. SUMS COMPLAINT(54447206) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  49. SUMS COMPLAINT(54447205) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN C. LUND 363 BALDWIN DRIVE BEREA, OH 44017
  50. SUMS COMPLAINT(54447204) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: LAUREN J. LUND 363 BALDWIN DRIVE BEREA, OH 44017
  51. SUMS COMPLAINT(54449084) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: JOHN C. LUND 363 BALDWIN DRIVE BEREA, OH 44017
  52. SUMS COMPLAINT(54449083) SENT BY SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER. TO: LAUREN J. LUND 363 BALDWIN DRIVE BEREA, OH 44017
  53. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  54. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  55. WRIT FEE
  56. WRIT FEE
  57. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  58. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  59. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  60. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  61. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  62. WRIT FEE
  63. WRIT FEE
  64. WRIT FEE
  65. WRIT FEE
  66. WRIT FEE
  67. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  68. WRIT FEE
  69. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  70. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE
  71. SUMS COMPLAINT(54424436) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CITY OF BEREA, OHIO 11 BEREA COMMONS BEREA, OH 44017
  72. SUMS COMPLAINT(54424435) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL 150 EAST GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215-0000
  73. SUMS COMPLAINT(54424434) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN C/O US ATTY FOR THE N. DISTRICT 801 WEST SUPERIOR AVENUE, SUITE 400 CLEVELAND, OH 44113-0000
  74. SUMS COMPLAINT(54424433) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: JOHN C. LUND 363 BALDWIN DRIVE BEREA, OH 44017
  75. SUMS COMPLAINT(54424432) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: LAUREN J. LUND 363 BALDWIN DRIVE BEREA, OH 44017
  76. MAGISTRATE BRIAN S GOZELANCZYK ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  77. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  78. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  79. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  80. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  81. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  82. WRIT FEE
  83. WRIT FEE
  84. WRIT FEE
  85. WRIT FEE
  86. WRIT FEE
  87. ALL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  88. IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  89. JUDGE JOHN D SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  90. SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  91. LEGAL RESEARCH
  92. LEGAL NEWS
  93. LEGAL AID
  94. COMPUTER FEE
  95. CLERK'S FEE
  96. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH
  97. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID JUSTIN M. RITCH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more