Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Danbury County

Court

Danbury County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-30
Type T 20 Torts Products Liability Other Than Vehicular
Docket 37 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lily Sidovar Ppa Susan Lasky Sidovar|Susan Lasky Sidovar
Defendant Mexicue Stamford, Llc|Thomas M. Kelly Iii|Mexicue Hr Llc

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. ORDER RESULT: Order 8/1/2024 HON THOMAS WELCH
  6. MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE PB 2-16
  7. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD (PRE 1/1/24)/BRIDGEPORT (POST 1/1/24)
  8. TRANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY
  9. RANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD (PRE 1/1/24)/BRIDGEPORT (POST 1/1/24)
  10. RANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY
  11. OTICE of Service of Interrogatories and Request for Production
  12. OTICE of Service of Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production
  13. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 9/9/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  14. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/9/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  15. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 re: Defendants' discovery at D.E. #105.00 (dated 08/08/2024) RESULT: Order 10/21/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  16. RDER RESULT: Order 10/21/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  17. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RESULT: Granted 11/5/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  18. RDER RESULT: Granted 11/5/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  19. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE re: Defendants' Interrogatories and Requests for Production dated 8/8/2024 (D.E. #105.00)
  20. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD RESULT: Denied 11/21/2024 BY THE CLERK
  21. RDER RESULT: Denied 11/21/2024 BY THE CLERK
  22. NSWER
  23. LAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  24. ERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  25. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Withdrawn 11/20/2024 BY THE DEFENDANT
  26. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION
  27. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 12/3/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  28. RDER RESULT: Granted 12/3/2024 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  29. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Withdrawn 12/20/2024 BY THE DEFENDANT
  30. ITHDRAWAL OF MOTION
  31. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 1/6/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  32. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/6/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  33. CHEDULING ORDER Proposed RESULT: Order 1/9/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  34. RDER RESULT: Order 1/9/2025 HON MAXIMINO MEDINA
  35. OTICE of Service of Standard Form Discovery as to all Defendants
  36. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE As to Plaintiff's Non-Standard Interrogatories
  37. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE As to Plaintiffs' 1/10/2025 Set of Interrogatories

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more