Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Travis County

Court

Travis County

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-02
Status Open
Type Malpractice Medical
Docket 74 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Schramm, Karen
Defendant Capitol Pain Institute, Pa
Photo of Hon. 201 St, District Court

Judge

Hon. 201 St, District Court

Travis County

Texas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. OTHER/NOTICE RULE 203 SHAYA PRECISION HEALTH
  3. OTHER/NOTICE SERVICE REQUEST
  5. OTHER/NOTICE PROCESS REQUEST FORM - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF CITATION ON DANA SWANSON, CRNA
  7. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED RETURN SERVICE OF CITATION - CENTER FOR SPECIALTY SURGERY OF AUSTIN, LLC. Party: Plaintiff SCHRAMM, KAREN
  9. FINAL OR PARTIAL DISPOSITION ORDER PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF NONSUIT OF CELEBRITY ANESTESIA Party: Plaintiff SCHRAMM, KAREN
  11. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANT DANA SWANSON, CRNA'S ORIGINAL ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION Party: Defendant SWANSON, DANA
  13. FINAL OR PARTIAL DISPOSITION ORDER PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF NONSUIT WITHOUT PREJUDICE Party: Plaintiff SCHRAMM, KAREN
  15. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS SEE LIST
  17. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS CAPITAL PAIN INSTITUTE
  19. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE RONEY BONE AND JOINT INSTITUTE
  21. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS CAPITAL PAIN INSTITUTE
  23. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CLINIC
  25. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS SOUTHWEST ORTHOPEDICS
  27. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF FILING OF AFFIDAVITS UNDER TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE 18.001
  29. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CLINIC
  31. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTION ST DAVIDS NORTH AUSTIN MEDICAL CENTER
  33. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTION BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE MEDICAL CENTER
  35. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTION BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE RONEY BONE AND JOINT INSTITUTE
  37. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS CENTEX INJURY & WORKERS COMP
  39. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS SOUTHWEST ORTHOPEDICS
  41. OTHER/NOTICE LETTER TO COURT - REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS DIRECTED TO THE CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS FOR BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE MEDICAL CENTER -TEMPLE PERTAINING TO KAREN SCHRAMM
  43. OTHER/NOTICE RULE 203-CENTEX INJURY & WORKERS COMP
  45. OTHER/NOTICE RULE 203-CENTER FOR SPECIALTY SURGERY OF AUSTIN
  47. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS SOUTHWEST ORTHOPEDICS
  49. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS CENTER FOR SPECIALTY SURGERY AUSTIN
  51. OTHER/NOTICE COVER LETTER
  52. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS CENTEX INJURY & WORKERS COMP
  53. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS NORTHSTAR ANESTHESIA
  54. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS CENTER FOR SPECIALTY SURGERY AUSTIN
  55. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS
  56. PLEADING PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED PETITION Party: Plaintiff SCHRAMM, KAREN
  57. OTHER/NOTICE PROCESS REQUEST FORM-CAPITOL PLAIN INSTITUTE, PA
  58. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED CITATION CAPITAL PAIN INSTITUTE PA
  59. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANT CAPITOL PAIN INSTITUTE, PA'S ORIGINAL ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED PETITION Party: Defendant CAPITOL PAIN INSTITUTE, PA
  60. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE RONEY BONE AND JOINT INSTITUTE
  61. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CLINIC
  62. OTHER/NOTICE RULE 203-ST. DAVID'S NORTH AUSTIN MEDICAL CENTER
  63. PLEADING PLAINTIFF S SECOND AMENDED PETITION Party: Plaintiff SCHRAMM, KAREN
  64. OTHER/NOTICE PROCESS REQUEST FORM- NEAL BLAUZVEM DO
  65. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER ORIGINAL ANSWER OF DEFENDANT, CENTER FOR SPECIALTY SURGERY OF AUSTIN, LLC Party: Defendant CENTER FOR SPECIALTY SURGERY OF AUSTIN, LLC
  66. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS GLOBAL IMAGING
  67. FINAL OR PARTIAL DISPOSITION ORDER PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF NONSUIT WITHOUT PREJUDICE Party: Plaintiff SCHRAMM, KAREN
  68. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS GLOBAL IMAGING
  69. OTHER/NOTICE REGARDING DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS
  70. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS
  71. PLEADING PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED PETITION Party: Plaintiff SCHRAMM, KAREN
  72. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS
  73. OTHER/NOTICE RULE 203 OPTUMRX INC
  74. OTHER/NOTICE RULE 203 WAL MART STORES INC

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more