Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Stamford County

Court

Stamford County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-28
Type V 90 Vehicular All Other
Docket 42 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Paride De Calice
Defendant Linda D. Woodin

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. RETURN OF SERVICE
  5. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 6/27/2024 HON TAGGART ADAMS
  6. ORDER RESULT: Granted 6/27/2024 HON TAGGART ADAMS
  7. MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES PB SEC 13-6(b) RESULT: Order 6/27/2024 HON TAGGART ADAMS
  8. ORDER RESULT: Order 6/27/2024 HON TAGGART ADAMS
  9. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE To Defendants non standard I & P's
  10. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS
  11. OTICE Notice of service re expert discovery
  12. EQUEST TO REVISE
  13. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Entry No. 106.00 RESULT: Sustained 11/4/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  14. RDER RESULT: Sustained 11/4/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  15. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Re: Petty Details & Police Officer
  16. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 Motion for Extension of Time re: Expert Production RESULT: Granted 9/30/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  17. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/30/2024 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  18. FFER OF COMPROMISE
  19. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD to Complaint RESULT: Granted 12/23/2024 BY THE CLERK
  20. RDER RESULT: Granted 12/23/2024 BY THE CLERK
  21. OTION TO STRIKE with Memorandum of Law in Support RESULT: Order 3/18/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  22. RDER RESULT: Order 2/7/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  23. RDER RESULT: Order 3/18/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  24. EMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION
  25. OTION TO OPEN DEFAULT
  26. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/13/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  27. BJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Motion to Open Default #113.00
  28. RDER RESULT: Overruled 1/13/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  29. BJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Motion to Strike Entry No. 112.00
  30. CHEDULING ORDER Joint Scheduling Order
  31. BJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiff's Supplement to their Objection #115.00 Re Defendant's Entry. #112.00 - New Law RESULT: Overruled 3/24/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  32. RDER RESULT: Overruled 3/24/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  33. OTICE Re: Filing an Amended Complaint
  34. MENDED COMPLAINT
  35. OTION FOR DEFAULT-FAILURE TO PLEAD to Amended Complaint 119.00 RESULT: Denied 5/12/2025 BY THE CLERK
  36. RDER RESULT: Denied 5/12/2025 BY THE CLERK
  37. OTION TO STRIKE with Memorandum of Law RESULT: Granted 7/14/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  38. RDER RESULT: Order 6/20/2025 BY THE CLERK
  39. RDER RESULT: Take Papers 7/14/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  40. RDER RESULT: Granted 7/14/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  41. BJECTION TO MOTION Plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Motion to Strike Entry No. 121.00 RESULT: Overruled 7/14/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH
  42. RDER RESULT: Take Papers 7/14/2025 HON EDWARD KRUMEICH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more