Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Pinellas County

Court

Pinellas County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-29
Status CLOSED
Type Forfeiture
Docket 17 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff City Of St Petersburg Police Department
Defendant Patrick Odell
Photo of Hon. Crane Shawn

Judge

Hon. Crane Shawn

Pinellas County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. IVIL COVER SHEET - NON REPORTING
  2. INAL JUDGMENT Volume: 23012 Page: 1519 Instrument #: 2024322905 Party: ODELL, PATRICK
  3. IVIL - CASE DISPOSED BY DEFAULT Amount: 4156.00
  4. FFIDAVIT AS TO MILITARY SERVICE
  5. LERK DEFAULT - ENTERED Party: ODELL, PATRICK
  6. UMMONS RETURN OF SERVICE - SERVED Party: ODELL, PATRICK
  7. ROOF OF PUBLICATION - NOTICE OF ACTION
  8. UMMONS - ISSUED Party: ODELL, PATRICK
  9. ONTRABAND FORFEITURE BOND
  10. OTICE OF FORFEITURE
  11. TTACHMENT TO COMPLAINT
  12. TTACHMENT TO COMPLAINT
  13. TTACHMENT TO COMPLAINT
  14. OMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE
  15. RDER GRANTING
  16. RDER
  17. OTICE OF FORFEITURE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more