Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Windham County

Court

Windham County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-26
Type P 90 Property All Other
Docket 44 entries

Parties

Plaintiff George A. Mclaughlin|Kelly L. Mclaughlin
Defendant Daniel W. Laframboise|Randy Brown|G.c. Lisbon, Llc|Laframboise Sand & Stone, Inc.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SUMMONS
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. PPEARANCE Appearance
  5. PPEARANCE Appearance
  6. PPEARANCE Appearance
  7. ETURN OF SERVICE
  8. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 9/10/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  9. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/10/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  10. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 10/7/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  11. RDER RESULT: Granted 10/7/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  12. OTICE non-standard to PL
  13. EQUEST TO REVISE
  14. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  15. RDER RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  16. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO REVISE objections to requests to revise - #104.00 RESULT: Order 11/19/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  17. RDER RESULT: Order 11/19/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  18. XHIBITS Exhibit to objections - #106.00
  19. EPLY to plaintiff's objection to request to revise
  20. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) request for early judicial settlement conference RESULT: Granted 11/15/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  21. RDER RESULT: Granted 11/15/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  22. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 11/21/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  23. RDER RESULT: Granted 11/21/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  24. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 RESULT: Granted 12/12/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  25. RDER RESULT: Granted 12/12/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  26. EVISED COMPLAINT
  27. NSWER TO REVISED COMPLAINT
  28. LAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  29. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE Motion to continue 12/20/24 settlement conf ahead 60 days to late February 2025 RESULT: Granted 12/17/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  30. RDER RESULT: Granted 12/17/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  31. NSWER
  32. OTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE - PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD - 13-6/13-9)
  33. CHEDULING ORDER
  34. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  35. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 1/10/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  36. RDER RESULT: Granted 1/10/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  37. NSWER
  38. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 2/23/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  39. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/23/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  40. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) re: Conference on 02/28/2025 RESULT: Granted 2/26/2025 HON CODY GUARNIERI
  41. RDER RESULT: Granted 2/26/2025 HON CODY GUARNIERI
  42. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD RESULT: Granted 3/23/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  43. RDER RESULT: Granted 3/23/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  44. ITHDRAWAL OF ACTION

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more