Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-22
Status Closed
Type Div Or Cust W/children (1 Ke)|Spouses With Minor Children Do Not Agree On All Issues To End Marriage
Docket 34 entries
Disposition dismissed

Parties

Plaintiff Gerdes, Brandon
Defendant Jackson, Christeen
Photo of Hon. Doty Daniel E

Judge

Hon. Doty Daniel E

Juneau Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Initial Judicial Assignment: Honorable Daniel Doty
  2. Complaint for Divorce (With Children) Receipt: 2188914 Date: 05/22/2024
  3. Domestic Relations Procedural Order and Assignment
  4. Child Custody Jurisdiction Affidavit
  5. Summons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
  6. Information Sheet - Confidential Document per Civil Rule 90.1(f)(1)
  7. Notice of Deficient Filing(s) mailed re: Domestic Relations Deficiency Memo (11/23) Sent on: 05/22/2024 16:04:42.01
  8. Attorney Information Attorney Thompson, Leif A representing Plaintiff Gerdes, Brandon as of 05/22/2024
  9. Return of Service - Summons Served On: 5/26/24 @ 19:32 by Clyde Pasterski Christeen Jackson (Defendant);
  10. Motion for Extension of Time Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Christeen Jackson (Defendant); Filing Party: Jackson, Christeen Case Motion #1
  11. Answer and Counterclaim Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Christeen Jackson (Defendant);
  12. LODGED: Information Sheet - Confidential Document per Civil Rule 90.1(f)(1) Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Christeen Jackson (Defendant);
  13. RECEIVED: Application for Services of Child Support Services Division (CSSD). Court will forward application with a copy of the child support order to CSSD. Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Christeen Jackson (Defendant);
  14. Motion Deemed Moot - Jackson, Christeen Case Motion #1 - Motion for Extension of Time
  15. Motion to Dismiss - Civil Rule 77(c)(2)(ii) Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Christeen Jackson (Defendant); Filing Party: Jackson, Christeen Case Motion #2
  16. Notice of Filing Materials Attorney: Thompson, Leif A (1006041) Brandon Gerdes (Plaintiff);
  17. Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Attorney: Thompson, Leif A (1006041) Case Motion #2: Motion to Dismiss - Civil Rule 77(c)(2)(ii)
  18. Reply to Opposition to Motion for Dismissal Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Christeen Jackson (Defendant); Case Motion #2: Motion to Dismiss - Civil Rule 77(c)(2)(ii)
  19. otice of Supplemental Briefing Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Christeen Jackson (Defendant);
  20. equest for Briefing Additional Briefing Due By: 8/9/24 Case Motion #2: Motion to Dismiss - Civil Rule 77(c)(2)(ii)
  21. ttorney Information Attorney Etengoff, Hannah Louise representing Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes as of 07/25/2024
  22. dditional Briefing RE: John v. Baker Attorney: Thompson, Leif A (1006041) Brandon Gerdes (Plaintiff);
  23. otion to Extend Time for Briefing Attorney: Etengoff, Hannah Louise (2007057) Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes (Non-Party Participant); Filing Party: Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes Case Motion #3
  24. otion for Expedited Consideration on Motion to Extend Time for Briefing Attorney: Etengoff, Hannah Louise (2007057) Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes (Non-Party Participant); Filing Party: Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes Case Motion #4
  25. rder Granting Motion - Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes Case Motion #4 - Motion for Expedited Consideration on Motion to Extend Time for Briefing
  26. rder Granting Motion - Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes Case Motion #3 - Motion to Extend Time for Briefing
  27. ttorney Information Attorney Kidd, Charles representing Non-Party Participant Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes as of 08/29/2024
  28. imited Entry of Appearance Attorney: Kidd, Charles (1809069) Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes (Non-Party Participant);
  29. otice of Intervention Attorney: Kidd, Charles (1809069) Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes (Non-Party Participant);
  30. esponse to Request for Briefing Attorney: Kidd, Charles (1809069) Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes (Non-Party Participant);
  31. eply to ANJC Response to Request for Briefing Attorney: Thompson, Leif A (1006041) Brandon Gerdes (Plaintiff);
  32. rder on Motion to Dismiss
  33. rder Dismissing Case
  34. ase Dismissed. Case Closed.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more