Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Escambia County

Court

Escambia County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-16
Status OPEN
Type Negligent Security
Docket 57 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Doss, Kendrell
Defendant The Moorings Associates, Ltd.|Emmer Development Corp.
Photo of Hon. / FRYDRYCHOWICZ , JENNIFER J

Judge

Hon. / FRYDRYCHOWICZ , JENNIFER J

Escambia County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PAYMENT $400.00 RECEIPT #2024052604
  2. PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: WILLIAMS, MATTHEW C ASSIGNED
  3. FRYDRYCHOWICZ, JENNIFER J: ASSIGNED
  4. EMAIL DESIGNATION.
  5. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  6. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  7. LAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S THE MOORINGS ASSOCIATES, LTD., D/B/A THE MOORINGS APARTMENT AND EMMER DEVELOPMENT CORP'S SUPPLEMENTALREQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF, KENDRELL DOSS
  8. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  9. UPPLEMENTAL REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  10. OTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED TO PLAINTIFF
  11. MENDED NOTICE OF TAKING ZOOM CONFERENCING DEPOSITION1
  12. HIRD RE-NOTICE OF TAKING ZOOM CONFERENCING DEPOSITION
  13. ECOND RE-NOTICE OF TAKING ZOOM CONFERENCING DEPOSITION
  14. EFENDANTS' CERTIFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION TO NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENAS UNDER RULE 1.351
  15. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  16. E-NOTICE OF TAKING ZOOM CONFERENCING DEPOSITION
  17. NITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - GENERAL
  18. LAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S THE MOORINGS ASSOCIATES,LTD., D/B/A THE MOORINGS APARTMENT AND EMMER DEVELOPMENT CORP'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF, KENDRELL DOSS
  19. OTICE OF SERVINGANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S THE MOORINGS ASSOCIATES, LTD., D/B/A THE MOORINGS APARTMENTS AND EMMER DEVELOPMENT CORP'S COLLATERAL SOURCE INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  20. LAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S THE MOORINGS ASSOCIATES, LTD., D/B/A THE MOORINGS APARTMENTS AND EMMER DEVELOPMENT CORP'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF, KENDRELL DOSS
  21. EFENDANT EMMER DEVELOPMENT CORP'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  22. OTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANT EMMER DEVELOPMENT CORP.'S ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S INTERROGATORIES
  23. EFENDANTS' CERTIFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION TO NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENAS UNDER RULE 1.351
  24. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTY
  25. OTICE OF TAKING ZOOM CONFERENCING DEPOSITION
  26. UMMONS RETURNED SERVED
  27. OTICE OF FILING RETURN OF SERVICE
  28. EQUEST TO PRODUCE
  29. OTICE OF NEGLIGENT SECURITY INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDEDTO: PLAINTIFF
  30. OTICE OF COLLATERAL SOURCE INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDEDTO: PLAINTIFF
  31. EFENDANTS, THE MOORINGS ASSOCIATES, LTD., D/B/ATHE MOORINGS APARTMENTS AND EMMER DEVELOPMENT CORP. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
  32. EFENDANT'S ATTORNEY: MCGRANE, MILES AMBROSE IV ASSIGNED
  33. OTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 2.516
  34. LAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTM THE MOORINGS ASSOCIATES LTD SERVED WITH SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  35. LAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT, EMMER DEVELOPMENT CORP., SERVED WITH SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  36. LAINTIFFS NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTM THE MOORINGS ASSOCIATED LTD., SERVED WITH SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  37. LAINTIFFS NOTICE OF PROPOUNDING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, EMMER DEVELOPMENT CORP., SERVED WITH SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  38. LAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT EMMER DEVELOPEMENT CORP INC SERVED WITH SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  39. LAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT, THE MOORINGS ASSOCIATES, SERVED WITH SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  40. UMMONS RETURNED SERVED
  41. OTICE OF FILING RETURN OF SERVICE
  42. OTION TO APPOINT PROCESS SERVER
  43. RDER TO APPOINT PROCESS SERVER
  44. OTION TO APPOINT PROCESS SERVER
  45. AYMENT $20.00 RECEIPT #2024054411
  46. IRST COLLECTIONS NOTICE SENT
  47. RDER REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING
  48. UMMONS ISSUED
  49. UMMONS ISSUED
  50. ROPOSED SUMMONS
  51. ROPOSED SUMMONS
  52. AYMENT $400.00 RECEIPT #2024052604
  53. LAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: WILLIAMS, MATTHEW C ASSIGNED
  54. RYDRYCHOWICZ, JENNIFER J: ASSIGNED
  55. MAIL DESIGNATION.
  56. OMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  57. IVIL COVER SHEET

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more