Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-23
Type Ac Rent And Possession
Docket 20 entries
Disposition default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Franks, Lamont A Jr
Defendant Guss, Aretha
Photo of Hon. McCarthy Thomas Adrian

Judge

Hon. McCarthy Thomas Adrian

St. Louis city (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  2. Return Service-Writ Non-Est Document ID - 22-EXEC-915; Served To - GUSS, ARETHA; Server - D MONTGOMERY, SERVICE DEPUTY; Served Date - 04-AUG-22; Served Time - 10:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Canceled by Atty/Pltf; Service Text - MOVED
  3. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  4. Order for Eviction This is garnishment 22-EXEC-915 for ARETHA GUSS; POSSESSION OF PRENISES AT : 5324-CLAXTON AVE AVE. ST.LOUIS,MO.63120; returnable date: 06-SEP-2022
  5. Writ Requested EVICTION
  6. Judge/Clerk - Note THERE WAS TWO DATES MARKED ON THE PAPERWORK AND I DIDN'T SEE IT UNTIL IT WAS TO LATE.
  7. Order for Eviction This is garnishment 22-EXEC-914 for ARETHA GUSS; POSSESSION OF PREMISES AT: 5324-CLAXTON AVE , ST. LOUIS ,MO.63120; returnable date: 06-SEP-2022
  8. Writ Requested EVICTION
  9. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  10. Judge/Clerk - Note COPY OF JUDGMENT MAILED TO DEFENDANT
  11. Judgment Entered Plaintiff appears or Attorney appears for plaintiff. Defendant appears not. Default Judgment against defendant for possession of premises at 5324 CLAYTON AVE, ST.LOUIS, MO. 63120. Court Cost assessed against PLAINTIFF. SO ORDERED: JUDGE THOMAS A MCCARTHY #56703
  12. Default Judgment Associated Entries: 05/23/2022 - Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 06/24/2022; 9:30 AM; THOMAS A MCCARTHY; City of St. Louis
  13. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  14. Posted - Residence Document ID - 22-SMLT-2043; Served To - GUSS, ARETHA; Server - N FRIAR, SERVICE DEPUTY; Served Date - 03-JUN-22; Served Time - 12:30:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  15. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  16. Summons Issued-Landlord/Tenant Document ID: 22-SMLT-2043, for GUSS, ARETHA.
  17. <td></td><td></td><td></td>
  18. Hearing Scheduled Associated Entries: 06/24/2022 - Default Judgment Scheduled For: 06/24/2022; 9:30 AM; THOMAS A MCCARTHY; City of St. Louis
  19. Confid Filing Info Sheet Filed Filed By: LAMONT A FRANKS JR
  20. Pet Filed in Associate Ct Filed By: LAMONT A FRANKS JR

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more