Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-07-02
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort Miscellaneous
Docket 23 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Megan Kern
Defendant Arhaus, Inc.
Photo of Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Judge

Hon. JOHN D SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54453640) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: STEPHEN S ZASHIN [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54453639) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: NEIL E KLINGSHIRN [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54453638) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: NEIL E KLINGSHIRN [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54453637) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: NEIL E KLINGSHIRN [email protected]
  6. DEFENDANT ARHAUS, INC. REMOVED THE INSTANT CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, CASE: 5:24-CV-01307, ON 07-30-24. CLERK OF COURT TO SEND THIS CASE RECORD TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. CMC BY PHONE SCHEDULED FOR 09/04/2024 AT 02:30 PM IS CANCELLED.
  8. NOTICE FILED BY D1 ARHAUS, INC. ATTORNEY STEPHEN S ZASHIN 0064557 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL
  9. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR ARHAUS, INC. 07/27/2024 17:01:56
  10. SCHEDULE ATTORNEY NOTICE. NOTICE GENERATED FOR KLINGSHIRN/NEIL/E 07/27/2024 17:01:56
  11. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 09/04/2024 AT 02:30 PM. CMC SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY PHONE, COURT TO INITIATE THE CALL. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE PARTICIPATE BY PHONE AND ARE REQUIRED TO FILE THEIR TELEPHONE NUMBER, ADDRESS AND EMAIL ADDRESS WITH THIS COURT PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE CMC. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. DISCOVERY IS TO START IMMEDIATELY. PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULES OF PROCEDURE. PARTIES TO BE READY WITH DEMAND AND OFFER OF SETTLEMENT.
  12. USPS RECEIPT NO. 54217157 DELIVERED BY USPS 07/08/2024 ARHAUS, INC. PROCESSED BY COC 07/17/2024.
  13. SUMS COMPLAINT(54217157) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ARHAUS, INC. 51 EAST HINES HILL ROAD HUDSON, OH 44236
  14. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  15. WRIT FEE
  16. JUDGE JOHN D SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  17. LEGAL RESEARCH
  18. LEGAL NEWS
  19. LEGAL AID
  20. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  21. COMPUTER FEE
  22. CLERK'S FEE
  23. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID NEIL E KLINGSHIRN

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more